PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABX vs. BABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BABX vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BABX vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-31.52%123.85%1.23%-33.89%-7.32%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-14.41%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-3.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -31.52% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's -14.41% return.


BABX

1D
5.70%
1M
-25.93%
YTD
-31.52%
6M
-56.68%
1Y
-30.71%
3Y*
-5.38%
5Y*
10Y*

BABA

1D
2.85%
1M
-12.94%
YTD
-14.41%
6M
-29.80%
1Y
-3.52%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
-10.05%
10Y*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABX vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX
BABX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABX vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABXBABADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.33

-0.08

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.09

0.23

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.03

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.10

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.98

-0.24

-0.75

BABX vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABXBABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

-0.08

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.07

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and BABA is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BABX vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.


TTM202520242023
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.59%1.36%1.96%1.29%

Drawdowns

BABX vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -70.62%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and BABA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BABXBABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.62%

-80.09%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.43%

-35.58%

-27.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.35%

-58.34%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.56%

-37.23%

-7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.47%

15.43%

+16.04%

Volatility

BABX vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 25.50% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 12.47%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BABXBABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.50%

12.47%

+13.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.87%

29.36%

+29.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.17%

45.97%

+46.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.96%

51.12%

+31.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.96%

43.22%

+39.74%