PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BABX vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and BABA is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

BABX vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.13%
11.06%
BABX
BABA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BABX:

0.34

BABA:

0.66

Sortino Ratio

BABX:

1.05

BABA:

1.22

Omega Ratio

BABX:

1.12

BABA:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

BABX:

0.36

BABA:

0.31

Martin Ratio

BABX:

0.95

BABA:

1.72

Ulcer Index

BABX:

26.72%

BABA:

14.24%

Daily Std Dev

BABX:

74.74%

BABA:

37.42%

Max Drawdown

BABX:

-70.62%

BABA:

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

BABX:

-60.70%

BABA:

-72.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's 0.39% return.


BABX

YTD

-0.06%

1M

5.58%

6M

10.13%

1Y

24.25%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BABA

YTD

0.39%

1M

3.45%

6M

11.06%

1Y

23.66%

5Y*

-17.18%

10Y*

-1.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BABX vs. BABA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABX is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABX is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABX is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABX is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABX is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABA is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABA is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABA is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABA is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABA is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABA is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BABX vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BABX, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.340.66
The chart of Sortino ratio for BABX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.051.22
The chart of Omega ratio for BABX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.121.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for BABX, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.360.57
The chart of Martin ratio for BABX, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.951.72
BABX
BABA

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.34
0.66
BABX
BABA

Dividends

BABX vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


TTM20242023
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.78%0.78%1.29%

Drawdowns

BABX vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -70.62%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-60.70%
-27.85%
BABX
BABA

Volatility

BABX vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 15.92% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 7.99%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
15.92%
7.99%
BABX
BABA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab