PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABX vs. AMZN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABX vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -53.86% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 0.85% return.


BABX

1D
-3.98%
1M
-34.60%
YTD
-53.86%
6M
-56.67%
1Y
-32.89%
3Y*
-6.12%
5Y*
10Y*

AMZN

1D
-4.75%
1M
-12.59%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.91%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
20.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABX vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-53.86%123.85%1.23%-33.89%-9.68%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.85%5.21%44.39%80.88%-7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BABX and AMZN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABX vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABX
BABX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABX vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABXAMZNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.09

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

0.51

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

1.18

-2.02

BABX vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABX and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BABX vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -73.95%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and AMZN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABXAMZNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.95%

-94.40%

+20.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.95%

-21.74%

-52.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.95%

-30.88%

-43.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.95%

-15.35%

-58.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.55%

-28.18%

-17.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.17%

9.37%

+29.80%

Volatility

BABX vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 15.92% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 10.30%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABXAMZNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.92%

10.30%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.27%

21.84%

+36.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.79%

30.95%

+56.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.86%

35.68%

+47.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.86%

32.57%

+50.29%

Dividends

BABX vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BABX nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BABX and AMZN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABX has higher volatility (15.92%) compared to AMZN (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -73.95% vs AMZN's -94.40%.

AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABX and AMZN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer