BABX vs. SHNY
BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and SHNY (MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BABX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while SHNY is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD). BABX is actively managed, while SHNY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BABX returned -1.49%/yr vs 45.14%/yr for SHNY. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BABX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SHNY.
Performance
BABX vs. SHNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABX achieves a -34.41% return, which is significantly higher than SHNY's -39.40% return.
BABX
- 1D
- 8.14%
- 1M
- 70.32%
- 6M
- -48.73%
- YTD
- -34.41%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -1.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.23%
SHNY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- 6M
- -47.72%
- YTD
- -39.40%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 45.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 39.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.82M | $17.86M | $21.53M | |
| $5.68M | $4.49M | $6.07M |
BABX vs. SHNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -34.41% | 123.85% | 1.23% | -40.11% |
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN | -39.40% | 214.54% | 50.30% | 10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABX and SHNY is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2023 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABX vs. SHNY — Risk / Return Rank
BABX
SHNY
BABX vs. SHNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) and MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABX | SHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.11 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.15 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 0.29 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABX vs. SHNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABX drawdown since its inception was -78.83%, which is greater than SHNY's maximum drawdown of -69.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABX and SHNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABX | SHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.83% | -69.36% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.83% | -69.36% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.83% | -69.36% | -9.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.98% | -68.12% | +5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.39% | -17.32% | -29.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.06% | 36.55% | +9.51% |
Volatility
BABX vs. SHNY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a higher volatility of 27.52% compared to MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY) at 18.04%. This indicates that BABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABX | SHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.52% | 18.04% | +9.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.46% | 62.24% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.46% | 83.21% | +7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.45% | 59.43% | +24.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.45% | 59.43% | +24.02% |
BABX vs. SHNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SHNY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABX vs. SHNY - Dividend Comparison
Neither BABX nor SHNY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABX and SHNY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABX has higher volatility (27.52%) compared to SHNY (18.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABX dropped -78.83% vs SHNY's -69.36%.
On 3-year performance, SHNY leads with 45.14% vs -1.49% for BABX. On fees, SHNY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SHNY has been the lower-risk option at 18.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SHNY has performed better with a 45.14% return vs -1.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHNY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.
BABX and SHNY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BABX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SHNY is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for BABX and 0.95% for SHNY.
SHNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABX and SHNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer