CRSOX vs. ATMP
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP).
CRSOX is managed by Credit Suisse. It was launched on Dec 29, 2004. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013.
Performance
CRSOX vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRSOX vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSOX Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund | 22.21% | 15.66% | 5.21% | -8.88% | 16.40% | 28.99% | -1.12% | 6.99% | -11.65% | 1.75% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 21.01% | 6.99% | 38.74% | 21.58% | 27.47% | 41.34% | -28.67% | 7.25% | -9.55% | -7.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSOX achieves a 22.21% return, which is significantly higher than ATMP's 21.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CRSOX has underperformed ATMP with an annualized return of 8.13%, while ATMP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.
CRSOX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 9.72%
- YTD
- 22.21%
- 6M
- 29.28%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
ATMP
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 6M
- 22.57%
- 1Y
- 18.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.03%
- 5Y*
- 26.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRSOX vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSOX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CRSOX vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
CRSOX
ATMP
CRSOX vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRSOX | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 0.99 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 1.33 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 1.22 | +2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 3.18 | +5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRSOX | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.99 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 1.21 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.49 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.30 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSOX and ATMP is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CRSOX vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
CRSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than ATMP's 4.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSOX Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund | 6.55% | 4.78% | 3.39% | 3.38% | 16.50% | 39.76% | 0.14% | 1.20% | 1.12% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.51% | 5.14% | 4.72% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 5.89% | 8.71% | 6.86% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 6.30% |
Drawdowns
CRSOX vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSOX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, roughly equal to the maximum ATMP drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSOX and ATMP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSOX | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.26% | -73.72% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.14% | -15.11% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -22.98% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.89% | -70.30% | +38.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.15% | -2.41% | -28.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.28% | -17.50% | -27.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 5.80% | -2.47% |
Volatility
CRSOX vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 3.96%. This indicates that CRSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRSOX | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 3.96% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 9.43% | +3.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 18.40% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 22.06% | -6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 27.57% | -13.28% |