CRSOX vs. DJP

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CRSOX (Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund) and DJP (iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, CRSOX returned 7.16%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for DJP. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CRSOX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for DJP.

Performance

CRSOX vs. DJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSOX achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly lower than DJP's 25.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CRSOX has underperformed DJP with an annualized return of 7.16%, while DJP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.63% annualized return.

CRSOX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 7.61%
• 6M: 8.08%
• YTD: 19.17%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: 10.92%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: 7.16%
• ALL TIME*: 0.97%

DJP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 8.69%
• 6M: 11.59%
• YTD: 25.98%
• 1Y: 40.97%
• 3Y*: 13.27%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: 7.63%
• ALL TIME*: -0.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRSOX Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN	$1.78M	$2.43M	$3.70M

CRSOX vs. DJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRSOX Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund	19.17%	15.66%	5.21%	-8.88%	16.40%	28.99%	-1.12%	6.99%	-11.65%	1.75%
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN	25.98%	17.20%	5.59%	-9.85%	17.46%	31.05%	-4.12%	7.63%	-13.07%	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSOX and DJP is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2006	0.95

The correlation between CRSOX and DJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRSOX vs. DJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRSOX

CRSOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
CRSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CRSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CRSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CRSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CRSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

DJP

DJP Risk / Return Rank: 78
DJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DJP Omega Ratio Rank: 84
DJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DJP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRSOX vs. DJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRSOX	DJP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.06	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.63	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.36	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.47	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.97	7.89	-0.92

CRSOX vs. DJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the DJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSOX and DJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRSOX vs. DJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSOX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, smaller than the maximum DJP drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSOX and DJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSOX	DJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.26%	-78.35%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.20%	-16.42%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.20%	-16.42%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.50%	-28.98%	+3.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.89%	-38.36%	+6.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.87%	-35.21%	+2.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.08%	-50.74%	+5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	5.13%	-0.77%

Volatility

CRSOX vs. DJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) is 5.19%, while iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that CRSOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSOX	DJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	5.94%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.76%	17.00%	-2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	19.73%	-2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	19.02%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.39%	17.09%	-2.70%

CRSOX vs. DJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSOX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than DJP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSOX vs. DJP - Dividend Comparison

CRSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, while DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRSOX Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund	4.31%	4.78%	3.39%	3.38%	16.50%	39.76%	0.14%	1.20%	1.12%	2.75%
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSOX and DJP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, CRSOX and DJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CRSOX or DJP?

DJP has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to CRSOX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSOX dropped -74.26% vs DJP's -78.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.