CRSH vs. QPX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -7.68% vs 24.81% for QPX. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for QPX.

Performance

CRSH vs. QPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly higher than QPX's 6.75% return.

CRSH

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 12.45%
• 6M: 19.65%
• 1Y: -7.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QPX

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 19.48%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	12.45%	-13.40%	-52.42%
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	6.75%	24.12%	15.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and QPX is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	-0.61

The correlation between CRSH and QPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.61 to -0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

QPX

QPX Risk / Return Rank: 52
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRSH	QPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.65	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	2.24	-2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.29	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	2.16	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	8.29	-8.64

CRSH vs. QPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the QPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and QPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than QPX's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and QPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	QPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-34.74%	-28.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.45%	-11.56%	-21.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.76%	-4.35%	-51.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.42%	-8.02%	-35.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.71%	3.00%	+18.71%

Volatility

CRSH vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) at 6.59%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	QPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.65%	6.59%	+3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.38%	12.42%	+9.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.54%	15.10%	+20.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.24%	20.09%	+27.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.24%	20.06%	+27.18%

CRSH vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.03%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	82.03%	138.78%	94.25%
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and QPX in my portfolio?

CRSH and QPX have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or QPX?

CRSH has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to QPX (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs QPX's -34.74%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or QPX?

On 1-year performance, QPX leads with 24.81% vs -7.68% for CRSH. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or QPX?

Over the 1-year period, QPX has performed better with a 24.81% return vs -7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or QPX?

CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or QPX?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 82.03%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

What is the main difference between CRSH and QPX?

CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while QPX is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 1.46% for QPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.