CRSH vs. TSLY
CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -6.08% vs 7.14% for TSLY. Their -0.94 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TSLY.
Performance
CRSH vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly higher than TSLY's -24.18% return.
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 26.66%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.14%
TSLY
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -18.26%
- 6M
- -22.89%
- YTD
- -24.18%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- -0.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $424.74K | $328.09K | $368.71K | |
| $13.88M | $12.88M | $17.43M |
CRSH vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 26.66% | -13.40% | -52.42% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.18% | 13.62% | 60.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and TSLY is -0.97, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | -0.94 |
The correlation between CRSH and TSLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
TSLY
CRSH vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRSH | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.06 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 0.18 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 0.52 | -0.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than TSLY's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -49.52% | -14.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.54% | -31.78% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.17% | -29.10% | -21.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.98% | -19.79% | -24.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.47% | 10.80% | +9.67% |
Volatility
CRSH vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 14.23%, while YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a volatility of 18.70%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.23% | 18.70% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.57% | 29.69% | -3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.89% | 38.29% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 46.00% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 46.00% | +1.50% |
CRSH vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRSH vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 75.02%, less than TSLY's 111.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 75.02% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 111.92% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSH and TSLY have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (18.70%) compared to CRSH (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 7.14% vs -6.08% for CRSH. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 14.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 7.14% return vs -6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 111.92%, compared with 75.02% for CRSH.
CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 1.07% for TSLY.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSH and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer