CRSH vs. VGT
CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. CRSH is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -6.08% vs 34.81% for VGT. Their -0.53 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
CRSH vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 20.36% return.
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 26.66%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.14%
VGT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 21.30%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 34.81%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 24.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $424.74K | $328.09K | $368.71K | |
| $440.89M | $515.41M | $573.34M |
CRSH vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 26.66% | -13.40% | -52.42% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 20.36% | 21.77% | 27.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and VGT is -0.57, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | -0.53 |
The correlation between CRSH and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.57 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
VGT
CRSH vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRSH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.23 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.94 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 5.23 | -5.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -54.63% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.54% | -16.40% | -15.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.17% | -9.93% | -40.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.98% | -7.95% | -36.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.47% | 6.07% | +14.40% |
Volatility
CRSH vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.42%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.23% | 8.42% | +5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.57% | 20.14% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.89% | 24.28% | +12.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 25.83% | +21.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 24.89% | +22.61% |
CRSH vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRSH vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 75.02%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 75.02% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSH and VGT have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSH has higher volatility (14.23%) compared to VGT (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 34.81% vs -6.08% for CRSH. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 8.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 34.81% return vs -6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 75.02%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.
CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSH and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer