CRSH vs. TSLA
Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA).
CRSH is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on May 1, 2024.
Performance
CRSH vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRSH vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 18.37% | -13.40% | -51.96% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -15.22% | 11.36% | 124.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -15.22% return.
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 24.09%
- 1Y
- -24.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLA
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -15.22%
- 6M
- -17.02%
- 1Y
- 42.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 37.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
TSLA
CRSH vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRSH | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | 0.76 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 1.41 | -2.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.17 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.71 | -2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 4.17 | -4.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRSH | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 0.76 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.72 | -1.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and TSLA is -0.96. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CRSH vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.61%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 100.61% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and TSLA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -73.63% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.16% | -27.48% | -20.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.43% | -22.17% | -31.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.91% | -22.77% | -19.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.23% | 11.30% | +23.93% |
Volatility
CRSH vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 8.04%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 11.32% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.47% | 29.84% | -6.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.40% | 55.50% | -13.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.37% | 59.08% | -10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.37% | 59.02% | -10.65% |