CRSH vs. ONEQ

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. CRSH is actively managed, while ONEQ is passively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -14.58% vs 23.27% for ONEQ. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.

Performance

CRSH vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRSH having a 10.49% return and ONEQ slightly higher at 10.61%.

CRSH

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 1.57%
• 6M: 7.85%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 1Y: -14.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ONEQ

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -1.74%
• 6M: 9.34%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 23.27%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: 13.29%
• 10Y*: 18.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	10.49%	-13.40%	-52.42%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	10.61%	20.89%	24.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and ONEQ is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	-0.62

The correlation between CRSH and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 6
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRSH	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	1.31	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	1.84	-2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.23	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	1.85	-2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.72	6.64	-7.36

CRSH vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-55.09%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.54%	-12.64%	-18.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.53%	-5.59%	-50.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.84%	-7.93%	-35.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.38%	3.51%	+16.87%

Volatility

CRSH vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) at 5.87%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.48%	5.87%	+7.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.78%	14.25%	+10.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.08%	17.82%	+18.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.24%	22.42%	+24.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.24%	21.78%	+25.46%

CRSH vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.28%, more than ONEQ's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	81.28%	138.78%	94.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.88%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and ONEQ in my portfolio?

CRSH and ONEQ have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or ONEQ?

CRSH has higher volatility (13.48%) compared to ONEQ (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or ONEQ?

On 1-year performance, ONEQ leads with 23.27% vs -14.58% for CRSH. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ONEQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or ONEQ?

Over the 1-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 23.27% return vs -14.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or ONEQ?

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or ONEQ?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 81.28%, compared with 0.88% for ONEQ.

What is the main difference between CRSH and ONEQ?

CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.21% for ONEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.