CRML vs. MP
CRML (Critical Metals Corp) and MP (MP Materials Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, CRML returned 44.09% vs -35.04% for MP. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CRML vs. MP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRML achieves a -20.89% return, which is significantly lower than MP's -18.11% return.
CRML
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -42.57%
- 6M
- -58.31%
- YTD
- -20.89%
- 1Y
- 44.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -18.49%
MP
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -22.40%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- YTD
- -18.11%
- 1Y
- -35.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.75M | $39.93M | $77.94M | |
| $269.01M | $254.79M | $346.46M |
CRML vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRML Critical Metals Corp | -20.89% | 2.21% | -24.64% |
MP MP Materials Corp. | -18.11% | 223.85% | 6.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRML and MP is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, CRML and MP have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CRML:
$512.97M
MP:
$7.36B
CRML:
$560.62K
MP:
$305.30M
CRML:
$560.62K
MP:
$25.30M
CRML:
-$47.47M
MP:
$1.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRML vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank
CRML
MP
CRML vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRML | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.97 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | -0.54 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | -0.90 | +1.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRML vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, which is greater than MP's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and MP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRML | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.91% | -81.99% | -11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.88% | -61.38% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.68% | -58.06% | -23.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.37% | -42.72% | -25.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.68% | 36.61% | +22.07% |
Volatility
CRML vs. MP - Volatility Comparison
Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a higher volatility of 23.01% compared to MP Materials Corp. (MP) at 20.22%. This indicates that CRML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRML | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.01% | 20.22% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 84.11% | 50.61% | +33.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 155.87% | 74.63% | +81.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 181.19% | 69.99% | +111.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 181.19% | 72.47% | +108.72% |
Dividends
CRML vs. MP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRML nor MP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRML vs. MP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Critical Metals Corp and MP Materials Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRML and MP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRML has higher volatility (23.01%) compared to MP (20.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRML dropped -93.91% vs MP's -81.99%.
CRML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRML and MP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer