MP vs. LAC
MP (MP Materials Corp.) and LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, MP returned 71.48% vs 68.70% for LAC. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MP vs. LAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's 1.38% return.
MP
- 1D
- 6.64%
- 1M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 6M
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 71.48%
- 3Y*
- 38.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.58%
- 10Y*
- —
LAC
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- -4.12%
- 1Y
- 68.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MP vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MP MP Materials Corp. | 20.43% | 223.85% | -21.41% | 3.93% |
LAC Lithium Americas Corp. | 1.38% | 46.80% | -53.59% | -27.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MP and LAC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.56 |
The correlation between MP and LAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
MP:
-$0.53
LAC:
-$0.28
MP:
$305.30M
LAC:
$0.00
MP:
$25.30M
LAC:
-$580.22K
MP:
$1.52M
LAC:
-$52.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MP vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank
MP
LAC
MP vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MP | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 1.09 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 1.64 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MP vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, roughly equal to the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and LAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MP | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -81.83% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.79% | -63.08% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.33% | -62.29% | +23.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.59% | -63.12% | +20.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.46% | 41.91% | -9.45% |
Volatility
MP vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison
MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a higher volatility of 22.99% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 21.68%. This indicates that MP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MP | LAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.99% | 21.68% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.41% | 53.02% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.82% | 132.11% | -40.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.64% | 101.34% | -31.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.64% | 101.34% | -28.70% |
Dividends
MP vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison
Neither MP nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MP vs. LAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MP and LAC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MP has higher volatility (22.99%) compared to LAC (21.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MP dropped -81.99% vs LAC's -81.83%.
MP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MP and LAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer