PortfoliosLab logo
MP vs. LAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MP and LAC is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MP vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MP:

0.25

LAC:

-0.50

Sortino Ratio

MP:

0.95

LAC:

-0.37

Omega Ratio

MP:

1.11

LAC:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

MP:

0.23

LAC:

-0.43

Martin Ratio

MP:

1.03

LAC:

-1.02

Ulcer Index

MP:

17.96%

LAC:

34.76%

Daily Std Dev

MP:

67.55%

LAC:

73.76%

Max Drawdown

MP:

-81.99%

LAC:

-81.83%

Current Drawdown

MP:

-63.53%

LAC:

-75.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MP:

$3.48B

LAC:

$618.00M

EPS

MP:

-$0.63

LAC:

-$0.22

PS Ratio

MP:

16.13

LAC:

177.97

PB Ratio

MP:

3.36

LAC:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

MP:

$215.98M

LAC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

MP:

$4.83M

LAC:

-$158.16K

EBITDA (TTM)

MP:

-$41.04M

LAC:

-$35.58M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a 36.22% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's -4.38% return.


MP

YTD

36.22%

1M

-19.35%

6M

15.80%

1Y

16.44%

3Y*

-17.77%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LAC

YTD

-4.38%

1M

5.97%

6M

-21.55%

1Y

-36.47%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MP Materials Corp.

Lithium Americas Corp.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MP vs. LAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MP is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MP is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MP is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MP is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MP is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MP is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

LAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LAC is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LAC is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LAC is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LAC is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LAC is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LAC is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MP vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MP Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MP and LAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MP vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither MP nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MP vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, roughly equal to the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and LAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MP vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 16.06%. This indicates that MP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MP vs. LAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
60.81M
-17.00
(MP) Total Revenue
(LAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MP vs. LAC - Valuation Comparison

The chart below illustrates the valuation comparison between MP Materials Corp. and Lithium Americas Corp. over time, highlighting four key metrics: Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio, Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) Ratio, Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio, and Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio.

MP - PS Ratio

This chart shows the Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio for MP relative to other companies in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry. Currently, MP has a P/S ratio of 16.1. This P/S ratio falls within the average range for the industry, suggesting the stock is fairly valued based on its revenue.

LAC - PS Ratio

This chart shows the Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio for LAC relative to other companies in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry. Currently, LAC has a P/S ratio of 178.0. This P/S ratio falls within the average range for the industry, suggesting the stock is fairly valued based on its revenue.

MP - PB Ratio

The chart illustrates the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio for MP in comparison with other companies in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry. Currently, MP has a P/B value of 3.4. This P/B ratio is higher than most companies in the industry. It may suggest the stock is overvalued or that investors expect the company to generate high returns on its assets.

LAC - PB Ratio

The chart illustrates the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio for LAC in comparison with other companies in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry. Currently, LAC has a P/B value of 1.0. This P/B ratio is in line with the industry average, suggesting the stock is valued fairly in relation to its book value.

User Portfolios with MP or LAC


V
MSFT
META
LLY
RHM.DE
CCEP.L
MELI
MSTR
AAPL
FTNT
AMZN
ICE
STRL
TSM
TKO
HWM
LRN
GOOGL
ISRG
CVS
RTX
BABA
LMB
MO
PLTR
NVDA
BN
AVGO
NOW
LEU
DRS
TPR
PSA
RYCEY
SMMT
NVO
SPOT
UL
ADMA
HOOD
ACHR
HNRG
CICHY
III.L
CRS
BYDDY
TSLA
MP
AMD
AMAT
TDY
Dream
21%
YTD
MSFT
MELI
FTNT
MSTR
META
RHM.DE
CCEP.L
PEN
STRL
ICE
AMZN
AAPL
V
LLY
TKO
TSLA
SAP
GOOGL
NVDA
TDY
RTX
PLTR
BABA
AVGO
BN
SCHW
SFM
MNDY
CICHF
AMD
SMMT
DRS
CRSP
CVS
BYDDY
MP
ISRG
TPR
LEU
SPOT
ACHR
III.L
UL
RYCEY
VTR
ADMA
LMT
WMT
CHDN
1 / 4

Recent discussions