CRML vs. REMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CRML (Critical Metals Corp) is a stock, while REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Over the past year, CRML returned 44.09% vs 36.09% for REMX. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CRML vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRML achieves a -20.89% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's -10.75% return.

CRML

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -42.57%
• 6M: -58.31%
• YTD: -20.89%
• 1Y: 44.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -18.49%

REMX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -23.93%
• 6M: -22.96%
• YTD: -10.75%
• 1Y: 36.09%
• 3Y*: -4.84%
• 5Y*: -7.48%
• 10Y*: 5.76%
• ALL TIME*: -5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRML Critical Metals Corp	$35.75M	$39.93M	$77.94M
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	$50.08M	$56.30M	$87.87M

CRML vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRML Critical Metals Corp	-20.89%	2.21%	-24.64%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	-10.75%	92.95%	-18.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CRML and REMX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024	0.34

The correlation between CRML and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CRML vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 63
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 54

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 31
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRML vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRML	REMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	0.74	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	1.29	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.15	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	0.89	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.78	2.75	-1.97

CRML vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRML Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRML and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRML vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, roughly equal to the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and REMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRML	REMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.91%	-90.20%	-3.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.88%	-41.03%	-41.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.11%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-73.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.68%	-69.79%	-11.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.37%	-66.81%	-1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	58.68%	13.28%	+45.40%

Volatility

CRML vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a higher volatility of 23.01% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 11.77%. This indicates that CRML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRML	REMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.01%	11.77%	+11.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	84.11%	37.31%	+46.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	155.87%	49.87%	+106.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	181.19%	40.57%	+140.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	181.19%	37.30%	+143.89%

Dividends

CRML vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

CRML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRML Critical Metals Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	1.97%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRML and REMX in my portfolio?

CRML and REMX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRML or REMX?

CRML has higher volatility (23.01%) compared to REMX (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRML dropped -93.91% vs REMX's -90.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.