PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MP vs. FCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MP vs. FCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly lower than FCX's 36.61% return.


MP

1D
6.64%
1M
7.36%
YTD
20.43%
6M
16.93%
1Y
71.48%
3Y*
38.76%
5Y*
14.58%
10Y*

FCX

1D
-1.55%
1M
14.15%
YTD
36.61%
6M
45.10%
1Y
68.87%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
21.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MP vs. FCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MP
MP Materials Corp.
20.43%223.85%-21.41%-18.25%-46.54%41.19%224.95%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
36.61%35.41%-9.41%13.69%-7.91%61.41%147.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MP and FCX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2020

0.45

The correlation between MP and FCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MP:

-$0.53

FCX:

$1.89

PS Ratio

MP:

26.81

FCX:

3.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

MP:

$305.30M

FCX:

$26.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MP:

$25.30M

FCX:

$7.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

MP:

$1.52M

FCX:

$9.59B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MP vs. FCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MP
MP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FCX
FCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MP vs. FCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.78

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

6.93

-4.72

MP vs. FCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MP Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the FCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MP and FCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MP vs. FCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, smaller than the maximum FCX drawdown of -92.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and FCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-92.52%

+10.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.79%

-24.90%

-28.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.47%

-46.34%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.99%

-51.47%

-30.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.33%

-3.71%

-34.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.59%

-39.60%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.46%

9.97%

+22.49%

Volatility

MP vs. FCX - Volatility Comparison

MP Materials Corp. (MP) has a higher volatility of 22.99% compared to Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) at 16.71%. This indicates that MP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.99%

16.71%

+6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.41%

37.46%

+13.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.82%

48.92%

+42.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.64%

45.04%

+24.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.64%

48.59%

+24.05%

Dividends

MP vs. FCX - Dividend Comparison

MP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
0.87%1.18%1.58%1.41%0.99%0.54%0.19%1.52%1.45%0.00%0.00%8.46%
MP
MP Materials Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MP vs. FCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
90.65M
6.23B
(MP) Total Revenue
(FCX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MP vs. FCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MP Materials Corp. and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
26.6%
Portfolio components
MP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

MP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported an operating income of 2.14B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.

MP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.

FCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported a net income of 881.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MP and FCX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MP has higher volatility (22.99%) compared to FCX (16.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MP dropped -81.99% vs FCX's -92.52%.

FCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MP and FCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer