CRML vs. ABAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT).

Performance

CRML vs. ABAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRML vs. ABAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRML Critical Metals Corp	14.41%	2.21%	-69.82%
ABAT American Battery Technology Company Common Stock	-16.47%	35.77%	12.33%

Fundamentals

EPS CRML : -$0.53 ABAT : -$0.37
PS Ratio CRML : 1.38K ABAT : 32.77
Total Revenue (TTM) CRML : $560.62K ABAT : $9.45M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRML : $560.62K ABAT : -$8.78M
EBITDA (TTM) CRML : -$47.47M ABAT : -$25.53M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRML achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly higher than ABAT's -16.47% return.

CRML

• 1D: 19.04%
• 1M: -21.77%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 27.65%
• 1Y: 471.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABAT

• 1D: 11.16%
• 1M: -24.39%
• YTD: -16.47%
• 6M: -42.59%
• 1Y: 170.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRML vs. ABAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 93
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ABAT

ABAT Risk / Return Rank: 80
ABAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ABAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ABAT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ABAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ABAT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRML vs. ABAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRML	ABAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.31	+1.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	2.40	+1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.29	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.01	2.20	+3.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.99	3.75	+6.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRML vs. ABAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRML Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the ABAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRML and ABAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRML	ABAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	1.31	+1.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.34	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between CRML and ABAT is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRML vs. ABAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRML nor ABAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRML vs. ABAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, roughly equal to the maximum ABAT drawdown of -93.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and ABAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRML	ABAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.91%	-93.18%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.74%	-77.85%	+0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.51%	-75.38%	+1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.66%	-77.03%	+8.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.77%	45.63%	+1.14%

Volatility

CRML vs. ABAT - Volatility Comparison

Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a higher volatility of 31.02% compared to American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) at 18.09%. This indicates that CRML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRML	ABAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.02%	18.09%	+12.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	124.55%	103.85%	+20.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	177.77%	131.47%	+46.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	158.24%	123.79%	+34.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	158.24%	123.79%	+34.45%

Financials