CRML vs. UAMY

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CRML (Critical Metals Corp) and UAMY (United States Antimony Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, CRML returned 44.09% vs 71.28% for UAMY. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CRML vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRML achieves a -20.89% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 1.00% return.

CRML

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -42.57%
• 6M: -58.31%
• YTD: -20.89%
• 1Y: 44.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -18.49%

UAMY

• 1D: -2.87%
• 1M: -31.76%
• 6M: -30.83%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 1Y: 71.28%
• 3Y*: 129.58%
• 5Y*: 39.11%
• 10Y*: 33.59%
• ALL TIME*: 6.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRML Critical Metals Corp	$35.75M	$39.93M	$77.94M
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation	$26.13M	$31.95M	$72.73M

CRML vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRML Critical Metals Corp	-20.89%	2.21%	-24.64%
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation	1.00%	183.62%	682.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CRML and UAMY is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024	0.36

Over the past year, CRML and UAMY have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRML : $512.97M UAMY : $751.30M
Total Revenue (TTM) CRML : $560.62K UAMY : $39.04M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRML : $560.62K UAMY : $4.34M
EBITDA (TTM) CRML : -$47.47M UAMY : -$15.23M

Return for Risk

CRML vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 63
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 54

UAMY

UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 66
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 68
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRML vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRML	UAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	0.51	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	1.69	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.18	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	0.89	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.78	1.36	-0.58

CRML vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRML Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRML and UAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRML vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, roughly equal to the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and UAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRML	UAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.91%	-96.44%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.88%	-74.30%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-74.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-80.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.68%	-70.98%	-10.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.37%	-66.39%	-1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	58.68%	48.56%	+10.12%

Volatility

CRML vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) is 23.01%, while United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a volatility of 24.68%. This indicates that CRML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRML	UAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.01%	24.68%	-1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	84.11%	83.69%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	155.87%	130.50%	+25.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	181.19%	95.37%	+85.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	181.19%	101.21%	+79.98%

Dividends

CRML vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRML nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRML and UAMY in my portfolio?

CRML and UAMY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRML or UAMY?

UAMY has higher volatility (24.68%) compared to CRML (23.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRML dropped -93.91% vs UAMY's -96.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.