PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRML vs. UUUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRML vs. UUUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CRML having a -20.89% return and UUUU slightly lower at -21.32%.


CRML

1D
-1.26%
1M
-42.57%
6M
-58.31%
YTD
-20.89%
1Y
44.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-18.49%

UUUU

1D
-2.31%
1M
-17.16%
6M
-49.02%
YTD
-21.32%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
18.03%
ALL TIME*
-13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.75M$39.93M$77.94M
$72.43M$84.27M$156.39M

CRML vs. UUUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CRML
Critical Metals Corp
-20.89%2.21%-24.64%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
-21.32%183.43%-18.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CRML and UUUU is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024

0.43

The correlation between CRML and UUUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRML:

$512.97M

UUUU:

$2.86B

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRML:

$560.62K

UUUU:

$84.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRML:

$560.62K

UUUU:

$31.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRML:

-$47.47M

UUUU:

-$78.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRML vs. UUUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRML
CRML Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

UUUU
UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRML vs. UUUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRMLUUUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

0.42

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

0.80

-0.02

CRML vs. UUUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRML Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is comparable to the UUUU Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRML and UUUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRML vs. UUUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, smaller than the maximum UUUU drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and UUUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMLUUUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.91%

-99.64%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.88%

-61.26%

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.68%

-95.13%

+13.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.37%

-92.64%

+24.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

58.68%

32.42%

+26.26%

Volatility

CRML vs. UUUU - Volatility Comparison

Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a higher volatility of 23.01% compared to Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) at 19.37%. This indicates that CRML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMLUUUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.01%

19.37%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

84.11%

60.99%

+23.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

155.87%

93.67%

+62.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

181.19%

73.24%

+107.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

181.19%

72.72%

+108.47%

Dividends

CRML vs. UUUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRML nor UUUU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRML vs. UUUU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Critical Metals Corp and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CRML and UUUU have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRML has higher volatility (23.01%) compared to UUUU (19.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRML dropped -93.91% vs UUUU's -99.64%.

CRML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRML and UUUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer