CRML vs. UUUU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CRML (Critical Metals Corp) and UUUU (Energy Fuels Inc.) are both stocks. CRML operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while UUUU operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past year, CRML returned 319.68% vs 197.97% for UUUU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRML vs. UUUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRML achieves a 50.58% return, which is significantly higher than UUUU's 10.87% return.

CRML

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: -4.83%
• YTD: 50.58%
• 6M: 29.98%
• 1Y: 319.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UUUU

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -10.64%
• YTD: 10.87%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 197.97%
• 3Y*: 38.79%
• 5Y*: 20.86%
• 10Y*: 21.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRML vs. UUUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRML Critical Metals Corp	50.58%	2.21%	-24.64%
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc.	10.87%	183.43%	-18.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CRML and UUUU is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024	0.42

The correlation between CRML and UUUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS CRML : -$0.53 UUUU : -$0.41
PS Ratio CRML : 1.82K UUUU : 32.54
Total Revenue (TTM) CRML : $560.62K UUUU : $84.86M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRML : $560.62K UUUU : $31.69M
EBITDA (TTM) CRML : -$47.47M UUUU : -$78.89M

Return for Risk

CRML vs. UUUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 86
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 80

UUUU

UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 85
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 81
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRML vs. UUUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRML	UUUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	2.08	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.58	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.30	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	3.89	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.02	7.34	-1.31

CRML vs. UUUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRML Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the UUUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRML and UUUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRML vs. UUUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, smaller than the maximum UUUU drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and UUUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRML	UUUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.91%	-99.64%	+5.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.74%	-51.28%	-26.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-61.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-68.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-79.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.13%	-93.14%	+28.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.09%	-92.63%	+24.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.36%	27.11%	+26.25%

Volatility

CRML vs. UUUU - Volatility Comparison

Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) have volatilities of 25.64% and 26.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRML	UUUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.64%	26.96%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	99.75%	66.67%	+33.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	165.32%	95.94%	+69.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	184.50%	73.36%	+111.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	184.50%	72.61%	+111.89%

Dividends

CRML vs. UUUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRML nor UUUU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRML and UUUU in my portfolio?

CRML and UUUU have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRML or UUUU?

UUUU has higher volatility (26.96%) compared to CRML (25.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRML dropped -93.91% vs UUUU's -99.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UUUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.