CRML vs. MP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRML (Critical Metals Corp) and MP (MP Materials Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, CRML returned 680.85% vs 211.59% for MP. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRML vs. MP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRML achieves a 58.65% return, which is significantly higher than MP's 35.69% return.

CRML

• 1D: -8.33%
• 1M: -14.72%
• YTD: 58.65%
• 6M: 32.97%
• 1Y: 680.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MP

• 1D: -5.11%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: 35.69%
• 6M: 16.76%
• 1Y: 211.59%
• 3Y*: 45.90%
• 5Y*: 16.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRML vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRML Critical Metals Corp	58.65%	2.21%	-69.82%
MP MP Materials Corp.	35.69%	223.85%	-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CRML and MP is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024	0.41

Over the past year, CRML and MP have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS CRML : -$0.53 MP : -$0.53
PS Ratio CRML : 1.91K MP : 30.21
Total Revenue (TTM) CRML : $560.62K MP : $305.30M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRML : $560.62K MP : $25.30M
EBITDA (TTM) CRML : -$47.47M MP : $1.52M

Return for Risk

CRML vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 94
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 91

MP

MP Risk / Return Rank: 86
MP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
MP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MP Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MP Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRML vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRML	MP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.92	2.27	+1.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	3.17	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.84	3.96	+4.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.34	6.77	+6.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRML vs. MP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRML Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the MP Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRML and MP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRML	MP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92	2.27	+1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.17	0.53	-0.70

Drawdowns

CRML vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, which is greater than MP's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and MP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRML	MP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.91%	-81.99%	-11.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.74%	-53.79%	-23.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-59.47%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.26%	-30.51%	-32.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.24%	-42.63%	-25.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.41%	31.40%	+20.01%

Volatility

CRML vs. MP - Volatility Comparison

Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a higher volatility of 23.49% compared to MP Materials Corp. (MP) at 21.38%. This indicates that CRML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRML	MP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.49%	21.38%	+2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.17%	50.40%	+51.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	175.33%	93.94%	+81.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	157.31%	69.57%	+87.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	157.31%	72.60%	+84.71%

Dividends

CRML vs. MP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRML nor MP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRML and MP in my portfolio?

CRML and MP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRML or MP?

CRML has higher volatility (23.49%) compared to MP (21.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRML dropped -93.91% vs MP's -81.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.