UUUU vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
Performance
UUUU vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UUUU vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc. | 23.45% | 183.43% | -28.65% | 15.78% | -18.61% | 79.11% | 123.04% | -32.98% | 59.22% | 9.15% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 21.47% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Fundamentals
UUUU:
-$0.43
CCJ:
$1.35
UUUU:
51.57
CCJ:
13.90
UUUU:
$78.74M
CCJ:
$3.48B
UUUU:
-$4.06M
CCJ:
$1.02B
UUUU:
-$90.66M
CCJ:
$1.05B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UUUU achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 21.47% return. Over the past 10 years, UUUU has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 22.86%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.
UUUU
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -23.19%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 389.10%
- 3Y*
- 47.62%
- 5Y*
- 24.59%
- 10Y*
- 22.86%
CCJ
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -11.62%
- YTD
- 21.47%
- 6M
- 33.36%
- 1Y
- 166.38%
- 3Y*
- 62.25%
- 5Y*
- 45.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UUUU vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
UUUU
CCJ
UUUU vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UUUU | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.13 | 3.07 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | 3.58 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.43 | 6.64 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.03 | 17.53 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UUUU | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13 | 3.07 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.92 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.55 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.24 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between UUUU and CCJ is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UUUU vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
UUUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UUUU Energy Fuels Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.15% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
Drawdowns
UUUU vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UUUU drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUU and CCJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UUUU | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.64% | -87.53% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.28% | -25.69% | -25.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.70% | -40.01% | -28.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.31% | -57.22% | -22.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.36% | -17.12% | -75.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.66% | -46.28% | -46.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.38% | 9.73% | +12.65% |
Volatility
UUUU vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a higher volatility of 22.68% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 16.63%. This indicates that UUUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UUUU | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.68% | 16.63% | +6.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.79% | 41.74% | +30.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.90% | 54.63% | +40.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.14% | 49.69% | +23.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.03% | 46.28% | +25.75% |
Financials
UUUU vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities