PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UUUU vs. CCJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


UUUUCCJ
YTD Return-11.27%22.92%
1Y Return-22.85%20.45%
3Y Return (Ann)-16.62%24.75%
5Y Return (Ann)25.58%41.59%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.98%12.16%
Sharpe Ratio-0.400.49
Sortino Ratio-0.250.97
Omega Ratio0.971.12
Calmar Ratio-0.230.64
Martin Ratio-0.751.53
Ulcer Index29.70%14.01%
Daily Std Dev55.85%43.75%
Max Drawdown-99.64%-87.87%
Current Drawdown-97.28%-8.69%

Fundamentals


UUUUCCJ
Market Cap$1.32B$23.68B
EPS-$0.23$0.20
PEG Ratio0.003.33
Total Revenue (TTM)$38.54M$2.08B
Gross Profit (TTM)$18.52M$422.03M
EBITDA (TTM)-$26.96M$398.87M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between UUUU and CCJ is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

UUUU vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, UUUU achieves a -11.27% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 22.92% return. Over the past 10 years, UUUU has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of -1.98%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.36%
6.02%
UUUU
CCJ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UUUU vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UUUU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UUUU, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UUUU, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UUUU, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UUUU, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UUUU, currently valued at -0.75, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.75
CCJ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.49
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.53

UUUU vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UUUU Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUUU and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.40
0.49
UUUU
CCJ

Dividends

UUUU vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

UUUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.17%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%3.36%2.88%2.50%2.19%1.85%

Drawdowns

UUUU vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUUU drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUU and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-97.28%
-8.69%
UUUU
CCJ

Volatility

UUUU vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a higher volatility of 22.03% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 13.39%. This indicates that UUUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%22.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.03%
13.39%
UUUU
CCJ

Financials

UUUU vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items