PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UUUU vs. CCJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UUUU and CCJ is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

UUUU vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-8.70%
8.66%
UUUU
CCJ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UUUU:

-0.57

CCJ:

0.18

Sortino Ratio

UUUU:

-0.60

CCJ:

0.56

Omega Ratio

UUUU:

0.93

CCJ:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

UUUU:

-0.33

CCJ:

0.24

Martin Ratio

UUUU:

-1.19

CCJ:

0.54

Ulcer Index

UUUU:

26.86%

CCJ:

14.66%

Daily Std Dev

UUUU:

55.99%

CCJ:

44.25%

Max Drawdown

UUUU:

-99.64%

CCJ:

-87.87%

Current Drawdown

UUUU:

-97.78%

CCJ:

-15.55%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UUUU:

$1.03B

CCJ:

$22.57B

EPS

UUUU:

-$0.22

CCJ:

$0.18

PEG Ratio

UUUU:

0.00

CCJ:

3.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

UUUU:

$38.08M

CCJ:

$1.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UUUU:

$19.10M

CCJ:

$523.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

UUUU:

-$13.65M

CCJ:

$433.12M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UUUU achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, UUUU has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 0.74%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


UUUU

YTD

1.56%

1M

-2.62%

6M

-7.30%

1Y

-31.45%

5Y*

24.73%

10Y*

0.74%

CCJ

YTD

0.47%

1M

-1.54%

6M

8.65%

1Y

10.09%

5Y*

43.66%

10Y*

15.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UUUU vs. CCJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UUUU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UUUU is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UUUU is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UUUU is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UUUU is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UUUU is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UUUU is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCJ is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCJ is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCJ is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCJ is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCJ is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UUUU vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UUUU, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.570.18
The chart of Sortino ratio for UUUU, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.600.56
The chart of Omega ratio for UUUU, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.931.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for UUUU, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.330.24
The chart of Martin ratio for UUUU, currently valued at -1.19, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.190.54
UUUU
CCJ

The current UUUU Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUUU and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.57
0.18
UUUU
CCJ

Dividends

UUUU vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

UUUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.22%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%3.36%2.88%2.50%2.19%

Drawdowns

UUUU vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UUUU drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUU and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-97.78%
-15.55%
UUUU
CCJ

Volatility

UUUU vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a higher volatility of 15.35% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 10.83%. This indicates that UUUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
15.35%
10.83%
UUUU
CCJ

Financials

UUUU vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab