UUUU vs. CCJ

In the year-to-date period, UUUU achieves a -12.09% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's -14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, UUUU has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of -1.57%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UUUU Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is comparable to the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UUUU and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

UUUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.

The maximum UUUU drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUUU and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a higher volatility of 26.53% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 16.91%. This indicates that UUUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.