CRML vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRML (Critical Metals Corp) is a stock, while MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Over the past year, CRML returned 656.55% vs 5396.82% for MUU. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRML vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRML achieves a 58.07% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 798.37% return.

CRML

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -17.58%
• YTD: 58.07%
• 6M: 10.36%
• 1Y: 656.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -15.35%
• 1M: 121.05%
• YTD: 798.37%
• 6M: 1,279.44%
• 1Y: 5,396.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRML vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRML Critical Metals Corp	58.07%	2.21%	1.34%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	798.37%	599.03%	-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CRML and MUU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024	0.18

Return for Risk

CRML vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 94
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 91

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRML vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRML	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.78	41.32	-37.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	6.77	-2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.86	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.52	104.05	-95.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.83	352.22	-339.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRML vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRML Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 41.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRML and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRML	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78	41.32	-37.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.17	5.91	-6.08

Drawdowns

CRML vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRML	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.91%	-75.07%	-18.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.74%	-52.72%	-25.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.40%	-15.35%	-48.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.23%	-23.42%	-44.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	51.57%	15.54%	+36.03%

Volatility

CRML vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) is 23.16%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 56.84%. This indicates that CRML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRML	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.16%	56.84%	-33.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.76%	106.70%	-4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	175.33%	132.77%	+42.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	157.17%	134.14%	+23.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	157.17%	134.14%	+23.03%

Dividends

CRML vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

CRML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRML Critical Metals Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.54%	4.27%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRML and MUU in my portfolio?

CRML and MUU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRML or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (56.84%) compared to CRML (23.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRML dropped -93.91% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (41.32 vs 3.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.