MUU vs. JNUG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while JNUG is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). MUU is actively managed, while JNUG is passively managed. Over the past year, MUU returned 3922.69% vs 61.91% for JNUG. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUU charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for JNUG.

Performance

MUU vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUU achieves a 727.77% return, which is significantly higher than JNUG's -32.23% return.

MUU

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: 33.37%
• YTD: 727.77%
• 6M: 1,033.51%
• 1Y: 3,922.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JNUG

• 1D: 6.13%
• 1M: -37.63%
• YTD: -32.23%
• 6M: -30.59%
• 1Y: 61.91%
• 3Y*: 61.16%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: -26.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUU vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	727.77%	599.03%	-40.91%
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF	-32.23%	478.59%	-18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MUU and JNUG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	0.22

Return for Risk

MUU vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

JNUG

JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 25
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUU vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUU	JNUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	28.62	0.61	+28.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.00	1.37	+4.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.19	+0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	75.54	0.92	+74.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	245.88	2.26	+243.62

MUU vs. JNUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUU Sharpe Ratio is 28.62, which is higher than the JNUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUU and JNUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MUU vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -75.07%, smaller than the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and JNUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUU	JNUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.07%	-99.95%	+24.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.72%	-67.53%	+14.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-67.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-80.07%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.00%	-99.62%	+77.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.43%	-93.87%	+70.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.16%	27.53%	-11.37%

Volatility

MUU vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a higher volatility of 65.35% compared to Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) at 39.22%. This indicates that MUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUU	JNUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	65.35%	39.22%	+26.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	114.18%	88.34%	+25.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.14%	102.58%	+36.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	136.95%	81.23%	+55.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	136.95%	106.73%	+30.22%

MUU vs. JNUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than JNUG's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUU vs. JNUG - Dividend Comparison

MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than JNUG's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF	1.81%	1.04%	2.01%	1.62%	0.00%	0.52%	0.10%	0.46%	0.06%	0.51%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.58%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUU and JNUG in my portfolio?

MUU and JNUG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUU or JNUG?

MUU has higher volatility (65.35%) compared to JNUG (39.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUU dropped -75.07% vs JNUG's -99.95%.

Which ETF is better, MUU or JNUG?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3922.69% vs 61.91% for JNUG. On fees, JNUG is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, JNUG has been the lower-risk option at 39.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MUU or JNUG?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3922.69% return vs 61.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUU or JNUG?

JNUG is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUU or JNUG?

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.58% for MUU.

What is the main difference between MUU and JNUG?

MUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while JNUG is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MUU and 1.03% for JNUG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (28.62 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.