MUU vs. JNUG
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and JNUG (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while JNUG is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for JNUG.
Performance
MUU vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUU
- 1D
- -12.33%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JNUG
- 1D
- 9.76%
- 1M
- -24.87%
- 6M
- -35.35%
- YTD
- -35.35%
- 1Y
- 66.61%
- 3Y*
- 60.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- -29.52%
MUU vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -27.74% |
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -16.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and JNUG is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JNUG
MUU vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUU | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -39.39%, smaller than the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and JNUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.39% | -99.95% | +60.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -67.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.39% | -99.64% | +60.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.51% | -93.90% | +77.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.72% | — |
Volatility
MUU vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | JNUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 39.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 89.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 263.59% | 104.82% | +158.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 263.59% | 81.84% | +181.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 263.59% | 106.54% | +157.05% |
MUU vs. JNUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than JNUG's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. JNUG - Dividend Comparison
MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than JNUG's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNUG Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 2.21% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 0.10% | 0.46% | 0.06% | 0.51% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUU and JNUG have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for JNUG.
JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.27% for MUU.
MUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while JNUG is Gold. MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 1.03% for JNUG.
Find the right allocation for MUU and JNUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer