CRK vs. ELF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF).

Performance

CRK vs. ELF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRK vs. ELF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc.	-9.06%	27.22%	105.88%	-32.37%	70.63%	85.13%	-46.90%	81.68%	-46.45%	-14.11%
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.	-20.29%	-39.43%	-13.02%	161.01%	66.52%	31.84%	56.17%	86.26%	-61.18%	-22.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRK : $6.21B ELF : $3.65B
EPS CRK : $1.34 ELF : $1.76
PE Ratio CRK : 15.68 ELF : 34.37
PEG Ratio CRK : 0.09 ELF : 0.28
PS Ratio CRK : 2.79 ELF : 2.35
PB Ratio CRK : 2.35 ELF : 3.14
Total Revenue (TTM) CRK : $2.22B ELF : $1.52B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRK : $2.06B ELF : $1.07B
EBITDA (TTM) CRK : $1.00B ELF : $220.91M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRK achieves a -9.06% return, which is significantly higher than ELF's -20.29% return.

CRK

• 1D: -3.66%
• 1M: 7.50%
• YTD: -9.06%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 3.64%
• 3Y*: 26.54%
• 5Y*: 31.48%
• 10Y*: 19.62%

ELF

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -34.16%
• YTD: -20.29%
• 6M: -54.25%
• 1Y: -3.47%
• 3Y*: -9.71%
• 5Y*: 17.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRK vs. ELF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRK

CRK Risk / Return Rank: 44
CRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CRK Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CRK Martin Ratio Rank: 45

ELF

ELF Risk / Return Rank: 41
ELF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
ELF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
ELF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ELF Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ELF Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRK vs. ELF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRK	ELF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	-0.05	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	0.46	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.07	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	-0.11	+0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	-0.22	+0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRK vs. ELF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRK Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the ELF Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRK and ELF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRK	ELF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06	-0.05	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.31	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.17	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CRK and ELF is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRK vs. ELF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRK nor ELF has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.65%	0.91%
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRK vs. ELF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRK drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than ELF's maximum drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRK and ELF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRK	ELF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.32%	-77.09%	-22.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.11%	-59.54%	+8.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.25%	-77.09%	+12.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.58%	-72.20%	-22.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.45%	-31.58%	-30.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.10%	30.06%	+0.04%

Volatility

CRK vs. ELF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) is 14.70%, while e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a volatility of 18.98%. This indicates that CRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRK	ELF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.70%	18.98%	-4.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.59%	59.83%	-17.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.01%	73.99%	-13.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.79%	56.55%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.32%	55.20%	+14.12%

Financials