PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRK vs. ARLP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CRKARLP
YTD Return51.30%44.01%
1Y Return19.25%37.21%
3Y Return (Ann)15.07%52.34%
5Y Return (Ann)15.89%27.26%
10Y Return (Ann)-12.63%4.07%
Sharpe Ratio0.431.45
Sortino Ratio0.951.98
Omega Ratio1.111.27
Calmar Ratio0.201.74
Martin Ratio1.126.19
Ulcer Index17.75%5.84%
Daily Std Dev45.98%24.86%
Max Drawdown-99.32%-90.52%
Current Drawdown-96.55%0.00%

Fundamentals


CRKARLP
Market Cap$4.16B$3.28B
EPS-$0.18$3.52
PEG Ratio-0.04-1.04
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.24B$2.48B
Gross Profit (TTM)$178.48M$576.84M
EBITDA (TTM)$625.24M$767.36M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CRK and ARLP is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CRK vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CRK achieves a 51.30% return, which is significantly higher than ARLP's 44.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CRK has underperformed ARLP with an annualized return of -12.63%, while ARLP has yielded a comparatively higher 4.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
25.72%
25.87%
CRK
ARLP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRK vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRK, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRK, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRK, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRK, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRK, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.12
ARLP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 6.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.19

CRK vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRK Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRK and ARLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.43
1.45
CRK
ARLP

Dividends

CRK vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

CRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than ARLP's 10.35% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CRK
Comstock Resources, Inc.
0.93%5.65%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.34%2.05%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.35%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.55%8.86%19.74%5.75%5.93%

Drawdowns

CRK vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRK drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than ARLP's maximum drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRK and ARLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-96.55%
0
CRK
ARLP

Volatility

CRK vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a higher volatility of 17.23% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 7.78%. This indicates that CRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.23%
7.78%
CRK
ARLP

Financials

CRK vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comstock Resources, Inc. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items