CRK vs. AR
CRK (Comstock Resources, Inc.) and AR (Antero Resources Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, CRK returned 16.96%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for AR. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CRK vs. AR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRK achieves a -42.80% return, which is significantly lower than AR's 4.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CRK has outperformed AR with an annualized return of 16.96%, while AR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.
CRK
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -45.54%
- YTD
- -42.80%
- 1Y
- -19.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.96%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.50%
AR
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 7.34%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.59%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $172.18M | $160.27M | $167.10M | |
| $34.07M | $34.06M | $38.78M |
CRK vs. AR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | -42.80% | 27.22% | 105.88% | -32.37% | 70.63% | 85.13% | -46.90% | 81.68% | -46.45% | -14.11% |
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 4.88% | -1.68% | 54.54% | -26.82% | 77.09% | 221.10% | 91.23% | -69.65% | -50.58% | -19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRK and AR is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between CRK and AR shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRK:
$3.89B
AR:
$11.11B
CRK:
$1.84
AR:
$3.48
CRK:
7.22
AR:
10.37
CRK:
0.04
AR:
0.04
CRK:
2.06
AR:
1.93
CRK:
1.50
AR:
1.35
CRK:
$1.89B
AR:
$5.84B
CRK:
$1.23B
AR:
$2.66B
CRK:
$1.26B
AR:
$2.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRK vs. AR — Risk / Return Rank
CRK
AR
CRK vs. AR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) and Antero Resources Corporation (AR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRK | AR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.05 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.13 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 0.27 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRK vs. AR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRK drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, roughly equal to the maximum AR drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRK and AR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRK | AR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.32% | -99.01% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.77% | -26.42% | -28.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.73% | -33.19% | -26.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.25% | -58.39% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.63% | -97.60% | +28.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.59% | -46.39% | -50.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.75% | -61.20% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.09% | 13.18% | +16.91% |
Volatility
CRK vs. AR - Volatility Comparison
Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a higher volatility of 13.76% compared to Antero Resources Corporation (AR) at 10.01%. This indicates that CRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRK | AR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.76% | 10.01% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.19% | 26.62% | +12.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.79% | 37.17% | +19.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.21% | 47.69% | +10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.05% | 60.69% | +6.36% |
Dividends
CRK vs. AR - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRK nor AR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AR Antero Resources Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.65% | 0.91% |
Financials
CRK vs. AR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comstock Resources, Inc. and Antero Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRK vs. AR - Profitability Comparison
CRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 317.94M and revenue of 353.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.0%.
AR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.5%.
CRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.58M and revenue of 353.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
AR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 375.46M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.
CRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 9.33M and revenue of 353.28M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
AR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Antero Resources Corporation reported a net income of 278.66M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRK and AR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRK has higher volatility (13.76%) compared to AR (10.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRK dropped -99.32% vs AR's -99.01%.
AR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRK and AR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer