CRK vs. EQT
CRK (Comstock Resources, Inc.) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, CRK returned 12.94%/yr vs 4.39%/yr for EQT. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CRK vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRK achieves a -42.15% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CRK has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 12.94%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.
CRK
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -39.13%
- YTD
- -42.15%
- 1Y
- -18.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.47%
EQT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 25.80%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.48M | $33.85M | $38.85M | |
| $418.95M | $392.36M | $389.11M |
CRK vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | -42.15% | 27.22% | 105.88% | -32.37% | 70.63% | 85.13% | -46.90% | 81.68% | -46.45% | -14.11% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 0.49% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRK and EQT is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, CRK and EQT have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CRK:
$3.94B
EQT:
$33.49B
CRK:
$1.84
EQT:
$4.55
CRK:
7.30
EQT:
11.77
CRK:
0.04
EQT:
0.09
CRK:
2.08
EQT:
3.61
CRK:
1.52
EQT:
1.33
CRK:
$1.89B
EQT:
$9.29B
CRK:
$1.23B
EQT:
$6.78B
CRK:
$1.26B
EQT:
$6.93B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRK vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
CRK
EQT
CRK vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRK | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.05 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.13 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 0.28 | -0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRK vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRK drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRK and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRK | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.32% | -91.51% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.77% | -27.89% | -26.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.73% | -31.62% | -28.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.25% | -42.56% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.63% | -87.56% | +18.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.55% | -20.93% | -75.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.76% | -23.34% | -39.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.02% | 12.70% | +17.32% |
Volatility
CRK vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a higher volatility of 13.84% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 10.22%. This indicates that CRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRK | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.84% | 10.22% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.95% | 20.52% | +18.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.55% | 30.53% | +24.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.22% | 42.08% | +16.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.50% | 48.97% | +17.53% |
Dividends
CRK vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
CRK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.65% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.22% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Financials
CRK vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comstock Resources, Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRK vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
CRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 317.94M and revenue of 353.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.0%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.7%.
CRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.58M and revenue of 353.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 394.04M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
CRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 9.33M and revenue of 353.28M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 281.45M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRK and EQT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRK has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to EQT (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRK dropped -99.32% vs EQT's -91.51%.
EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRK and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer