PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AES vs. XEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AES vs. XEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The AES Corporation (AES) and Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly lower than XEL's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has underperformed XEL with an annualized return of 5.82%, while XEL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.


AES

1D
0.04%
1M
1.89%
6M
2.66%
YTD
6.12%
1Y
16.48%
3Y*
-6.81%
5Y*
-5.40%
10Y*
5.82%
ALL TIME*
6.31%

XEL

1D
-0.04%
1M
-4.59%
6M
4.35%
YTD
7.46%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
9.29%
ALL TIME*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$95.04M$122.70M$132.98M
$387.09M$394.63M$451.51M

AES vs. XEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AES
The AES Corporation
6.12%18.26%-30.40%-30.88%21.69%5.94%22.16%42.14%39.02%-2.69%
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
7.46%13.89%12.32%-8.67%6.44%4.40%7.77%32.37%5.88%21.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AES and XEL is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 1991

0.34

The correlation between AES and XEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AES:

$10.47B

XEL:

$48.82B

EPS

AES:

$2.21

XEL:

$2.77

PE Ratio

AES:

6.64

XEL:

28.23

PEG Ratio

AES:

0.03

XEL:

7.28

PS Ratio

AES:

0.56

XEL:

3.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

AES:

$12.49B

XEL:

$14.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AES:

$1.77B

XEL:

$321.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

AES:

$2.73B

XEL:

$6.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AES vs. XEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AES
AES Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XEL
XEL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AES vs. XEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AESXELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.11

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.85

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

2.12

-0.42

AES vs. XEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AES Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the XEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AES and XEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AES vs. XEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than XEL's maximum drawdown of -80.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and XEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AESXELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.65%

-80.64%

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.98%

-11.50%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.33%

-23.99%

-29.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.43%

-34.41%

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-34.41%

-29.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.63%

-5.41%

-56.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.04%

-11.29%

-45.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.05%

4.62%

+6.43%

Volatility

AES vs. XEL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The AES Corporation (AES) is 1.06%, while Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that AES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AESXELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

5.77%

-4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.21%

15.09%

+8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.46%

19.41%

+15.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.58%

20.88%

+16.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.93%

21.75%

+14.18%

Dividends

AES vs. XEL - Dividend Comparison

AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than XEL's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AES
The AES Corporation
4.79%4.91%5.36%3.45%2.20%2.48%2.44%2.74%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
2.97%3.83%2.43%3.36%2.78%2.70%2.58%2.55%3.09%2.99%3.34%3.56%

Financials

AES vs. XEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The AES Corporation and Xcel Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

AES vs. XEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The AES Corporation and Xcel Energy Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

AES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The AES Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

XEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of -915.00M and revenue of 3.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -29.3%.

AES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The AES Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

XEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 706.00M and revenue of 3.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

AES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The AES Corporation reported a net income of 201.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

XEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a net income of 37.00M and revenue of 3.12B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AES and XEL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XEL has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to AES (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AES dropped -98.65% vs XEL's -80.64%.

AES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AES and XEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer