PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AES vs. AVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AES vs. AVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The AES Corporation (AES) and Avista Corporation (AVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than AVA's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has outperformed AVA with an annualized return of 6.06%, while AVA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return.


AES

1D
0.34%
1M
0.14%
YTD
5.00%
6M
8.33%
1Y
52.27%
3Y*
-6.03%
5Y*
-7.19%
10Y*
6.06%

AVA

1D
2.44%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
8.08%
6M
8.44%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AES vs. AVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AES
The AES Corporation
5.00%18.26%-30.40%-30.88%21.69%5.94%22.16%42.14%39.02%-2.69%
AVA
Avista Corporation
8.08%10.68%7.84%-15.31%8.79%10.27%-13.10%17.28%-15.07%32.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AES and AVA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 1991

0.29

The correlation between AES and AVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AES:

$1.97

AVA:

$2.53

PE Ratio

AES:

7.48

AVA:

16.09

PEG Ratio

AES:

0.04

AVA:

5.24

PS Ratio

AES:

0.63

AVA:

2.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

AES:

$12.49B

AVA:

$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AES:

$1.77B

AVA:

$711.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

AES:

$2.73B

AVA:

$455.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AES vs. AVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AES
AES Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AVA
AVA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AES vs. AVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and Avista Corporation (AVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AESAVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.12

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.20

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

3.01

+2.10

AES vs. AVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AES Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the AVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AES and AVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AES vs. AVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than AVA's maximum drawdown of -78.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and AVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AESAVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.65%

-78.86%

-19.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.98%

-9.89%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.33%

-20.43%

-32.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.43%

-28.74%

-34.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-37.17%

-26.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.03%

-4.12%

-57.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.02%

-21.81%

-35.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

3.95%

+6.31%

Volatility

AES vs. AVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The AES Corporation (AES) is 0.98%, while Avista Corporation (AVA) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that AES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AESAVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

8.38%

-7.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.36%

14.39%

+10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.64%

18.54%

+23.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.73%

21.64%

+16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.04%

25.54%

+10.50%

Dividends

AES vs. AVA - Dividend Comparison

AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, which matches AVA's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AES
The AES Corporation
4.79%4.91%5.36%3.45%2.20%2.48%2.44%2.74%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%
AVA
Avista Corporation
4.83%5.09%5.19%5.15%3.97%3.98%4.04%3.22%3.51%2.78%3.43%3.73%

Financials

AES vs. AVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The AES Corporation and Avista Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.18B
0
(AES) Total Revenue
(AVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AES and AVA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVA has higher volatility (8.38%) compared to AES (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AES dropped -98.65% vs AVA's -78.86%.

AES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AES and AVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer