AES vs. ABT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The AES Corporation (AES) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT).

Performance

AES vs. ABT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The AES Corporation (AES) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AES vs. ABT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AES The AES Corporation	-0.58%	18.26%	-30.40%	-30.88%	21.69%	5.94%	22.16%	42.14%	39.02%	-2.69%
ABT Abbott Laboratories	-17.64%	12.87%	4.81%	2.26%	-20.68%	30.53%	28.04%	22.08%	29.06%	52.03%

Fundamentals

EPS AES : $1.91 ABT : $3.73
PE Ratio AES : 7.36 ABT : 27.52
PEG Ratio AES : 0.04 ABT : 1.72
PS Ratio AES : 0.44 ABT : 4.05
Total Revenue (TTM) AES : $15.16B ABT : $44.33B
Gross Profit (TTM) AES : $5.45B ABT : $24.61B
EBITDA (TTM) AES : $4.56B ABT : $11.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's -17.64% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 5.87%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.

AES

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -18.46%
• YTD: -0.58%
• 6M: 9.71%
• 1Y: 19.93%
• 3Y*: -12.44%
• 5Y*: -8.86%
• 10Y*: 5.87%

ABT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -11.76%
• YTD: -17.64%
• 6M: -22.62%
• 1Y: -21.15%
• 3Y*: 2.45%
• 5Y*: -1.11%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AES vs. ABT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AES

AES Risk / Return Rank: 58
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 57
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 60

ABT

ABT Risk / Return Rank: 8
ABT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ABT Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ABT Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ABT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ABT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AES vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AES	ABT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	-0.92	+1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	-1.12	+2.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.84	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	-0.80	+1.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.88	-2.02	+3.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AES vs. ABT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AES Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the ABT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AES and ABT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AES	ABT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	-0.92	+1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	-0.05	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.48	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.41	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between AES and ABT is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AES vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison

AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than ABT's 2.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AES The AES Corporation	5.00%	4.91%	5.36%	3.45%	2.20%	2.48%	2.44%	2.74%	3.60%	4.43%	3.79%	4.18%
ABT Abbott Laboratories	2.34%	1.88%	1.95%	1.85%	1.71%	1.28%	1.32%	1.47%	1.55%	1.86%	2.71%	2.14%

Drawdowns

AES vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and ABT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AES	ABT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.65%	-55.57%	-43.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.27%	-25.18%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.43%	-33.88%	-29.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.43%	-33.88%	-29.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.05%	-25.41%	-38.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.99%	-14.29%	-42.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.66%	9.94%	+0.72%

Volatility

AES vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The AES Corporation (AES) is 1.54%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that AES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AES	ABT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	5.95%	-4.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.76%	16.83%	+15.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.97%	23.14%	+26.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.05%	21.98%	+16.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.18%	23.57%	+12.61%

Financials

AES vs. ABT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The AES Corporation and Abbott Laboratories over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The AES Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.82B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.4%.

ABT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 6.54B and revenue of 11.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.1%.

AES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The AES Corporation reported an operating income of -1.12B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of -18.6%.

ABT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.

AES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The AES Corporation reported a net income of 335.00M and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

ABT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.78B and revenue of 11.46B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.