AES vs. ABT
AES (The AES Corporation) and ABT (Abbott Laboratories) are both stocks. AES operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while ABT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, AES returned 6.02%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for ABT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AES vs. ABT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's -29.10% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 6.02%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.
AES
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 47.96%
- 3Y*
- -6.14%
- 5Y*
- -7.18%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
ABT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- -29.10%
- 6M
- -29.05%
- 1Y
- -32.61%
- 3Y*
- -4.78%
- 5Y*
- -2.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
AES vs. ABT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AES The AES Corporation | 4.65% | 18.26% | -30.40% | -30.88% | 21.69% | 5.94% | 22.16% | 42.14% | 39.02% | -2.69% |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | -29.10% | 12.87% | 4.81% | 2.26% | -20.68% | 30.53% | 28.04% | 22.08% | 29.06% | 52.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AES and ABT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 1991 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AES and ABT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AES:
$1.97
ABT:
$3.59
AES:
7.45
ABT:
24.47
AES:
0.04
ABT:
1.52
AES:
0.63
ABT:
3.40
AES:
$12.49B
ABT:
$45.13B
AES:
$1.77B
ABT:
$25.45B
AES:
$2.73B
ABT:
$10.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AES vs. ABT — Risk / Return Rank
AES
ABT
AES vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AES | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.76 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | -0.84 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | -1.77 | +6.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AES vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and ABT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AES | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.65% | -45.66% | -52.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.98% | -38.99% | +20.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.33% | -39.64% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.43% | -39.64% | -23.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.43% | -39.64% | -23.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.16% | -35.79% | -26.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.02% | -10.85% | -46.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.23% | 18.40% | -8.17% |
Volatility
AES vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The AES Corporation (AES) is 0.95%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that AES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AES | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 7.23% | -6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.40% | 19.44% | +5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.72% | 24.70% | +17.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.73% | 22.10% | +15.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.04% | 23.68% | +12.36% |
Dividends
AES vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison
AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than ABT's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 2.78% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% |
AES The AES Corporation | 4.80% | 4.91% | 5.36% | 3.45% | 2.20% | 2.48% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.60% | 4.43% | 3.79% | 4.18% |
Financials
AES vs. ABT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The AES Corporation and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AES vs. ABT - Profitability Comparison
AES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The AES Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ABT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 6.28B and revenue of 11.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.3%.
AES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The AES Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ABT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 11.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
AES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The AES Corporation reported a net income of 201.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
ABT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 11.16B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AES and ABT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to AES (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AES dropped -98.65% vs ABT's -45.66%.
AES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AES and ABT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer