AES vs. ABT
Compare and contrast key facts about The AES Corporation (AES) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AES or ABT.
Correlation
The correlation between AES and ABT is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AES vs. ABT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AES:
-0.73
ABT:
1.01
AES:
-0.85
ABT:
1.61
AES:
0.89
ABT:
1.19
AES:
-0.36
ABT:
0.75
AES:
-1.26
ABT:
2.36
AES:
22.12%
ABT:
8.14%
AES:
38.13%
ABT:
19.06%
AES:
-98.65%
ABT:
-45.66%
AES:
-76.37%
ABT:
-2.70%
Fundamentals
AES:
$8.13B
ABT:
$224.49B
AES:
$1.44
ABT:
$7.64
AES:
7.94
ABT:
16.94
AES:
1.09
ABT:
2.25
AES:
$9.32B
ABT:
$30.98B
AES:
$1.89B
ABT:
$17.29B
AES:
$2.66B
ABT:
$7.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than ABT's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 2.77%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.
AES
-11.11%
-10.27%
-33.63%
-30.56%
-8.02%
2.77%
ABT
15.03%
13.15%
24.78%
17.91%
9.70%
13.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AES vs. ABT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AES
ABT
AES vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AES vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison
AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, more than ABT's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AES The AES Corporation | 6.05% | 5.38% | 3.45% | 2.20% | 2.49% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 3.60% | 4.43% | 3.79% | 4.18% | 1.45% |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 1.73% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
AES vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and ABT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AES vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison
The AES Corporation (AES) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to Abbott Laboratories (ABT) at 7.42%. This indicates that AES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AES vs. ABT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The AES Corporation and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities