PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CQP vs. AVAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CQP vs. AVAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc. (AVAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQP achieves a 21.40% return, which is significantly higher than AVAH's -13.22% return.


CQP

1D
-3.81%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
21.40%
6M
22.64%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
14.69%

AVAH

1D
1.29%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
-13.22%
6M
-21.40%
1Y
44.40%
3Y*
72.97%
5Y*
-10.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQP vs. AVAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
21.40%6.80%12.59%-5.09%44.79%7.55%
AVAH
Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc.
-13.22%78.77%70.52%243.59%-89.46%-38.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CQP and AVAH is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2021

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CQP:

$30.58B

AVAH:

$1.57B

EPS

CQP:

$5.21

AVAH:

$1.20

PE Ratio

CQP:

12.13

AVAH:

5.90

PS Ratio

CQP:

2.69

AVAH:

0.61

PB Ratio

CQP:

392.10

AVAH:

6.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

CQP:

$11.37B

AVAH:

$2.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CQP:

$3.20B

AVAH:

$823.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

CQP:

$3.96B

AVAH:

$306.37M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CQP vs. AVAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQP
CQP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

AVAH
AVAH Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AVAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAH Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAH Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQP vs. AVAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc. (AVAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CQPAVAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.20

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.01

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

1.81

+0.70

CQP vs. AVAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQP Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the AVAH Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQP and AVAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CQP vs. AVAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQP drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, smaller than the maximum AVAH drawdown of -94.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQP and AVAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CQPAVAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.70%

-94.76%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.72%

-39.44%

+24.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-41.40%

+16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

-94.69%

+65.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.77%

-45.00%

+36.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-63.57%

+48.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

21.95%

-15.54%

Volatility

CQP vs. AVAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) is 9.30%, while Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc. (AVAH) has a volatility of 15.70%. This indicates that CQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CQPAVAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.30%

15.70%

-6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.67%

32.16%

-12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.21%

68.16%

-41.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.44%

78.16%

-45.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.14%

77.42%

-45.28%

Dividends

CQP vs. AVAH - Dividend Comparison

CQP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, while AVAH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVAH
Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
5.17%6.15%5.06%8.36%6.82%6.30%7.28%6.08%6.07%5.79%5.90%6.52%

Financials

CQP vs. AVAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
3.60B
647.92M
(CQP) Total Revenue
(AVAH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CQP vs. AVAH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
31.2%
Portfolio components
CQP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AVAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 202.38M and revenue of 647.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.

CQP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 361.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

AVAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 75.94M and revenue of 647.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

CQP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 186.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

AVAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aveanna Healthcare Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 41.65M and revenue of 647.92M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CQP and AVAH have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVAH has higher volatility (15.70%) compared to CQP (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CQP dropped -78.70% vs AVAH's -94.76%.

AVAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CQP and AVAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer