CNXT vs. FXP
CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) are both China Equities funds - CNXT tracks the SME-ChiNext 100 Index while FXP tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNXT returned 5.41%/yr vs -21.13%/yr for FXP. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FXP.
Performance
CNXT vs. FXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 20.68% return, which is significantly lower than FXP's 26.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has outperformed FXP with an annualized return of 5.41%, while FXP has yielded a comparatively lower -21.13% annualized return.
CNXT
- 1D
- -4.22%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 1Y
- 79.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
FXP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 42.91%
- YTD
- 26.04%
- 1Y
- 11.22%
- 3Y*
- -25.63%
- 5Y*
- -16.22%
- 10Y*
- -21.13%
CNXT vs. FXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 20.68% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 26.04% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 12.45% | -49.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and FXP is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014 | -0.58 |
The correlation between CNXT and FXP shifts across timeframes, from -0.60 (10 years) to -0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. FXP — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
FXP
CNXT vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNXT | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.08 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 0.51 | +4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.67 | 0.94 | +16.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. FXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, smaller than the maximum FXP drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and FXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -99.94% | +30.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.37% | -21.99% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.60% | -82.34% | +33.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | -87.85% | +26.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | -93.71% | +30.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.37% | -99.91% | +84.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -94.16% | +51.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 13.15% | -8.61% |
Volatility
CNXT vs. FXP - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 15.65% compared to ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) at 12.93%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.65% | 12.93% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.28% | 29.64% | -4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.35% | 40.22% | -5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.85% | 63.15% | -27.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.98% | 54.76% | -22.78% |
CNXT vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNXT vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than FXP's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 2.85% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNXT and FXP have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNXT has higher volatility (15.65%) compared to FXP (12.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs FXP's -99.94%.
On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 5.41% vs -21.13% for FXP. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXP has been the lower-risk option at 12.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 5.41% return vs -21.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
FXP has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.15% for CNXT.
CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 0.95% for FXP.
CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNXT and FXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer