CNXT vs. DRGN
CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.
Performance
CNXT vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 36.42% return, which is significantly higher than DRGN's 12.74% return.
CNXT
- 1D
- -4.05%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 36.42%
- 6M
- 34.79%
- 1Y
- 122.39%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
DRGN
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNXT vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 36.42% | 49.71% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 12.74% | 26.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and DRGN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
DRGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CNXT vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNXT | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and DRGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -20.86% | -48.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | -10.09% | +6.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -8.05% | -34.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | — | — |
Volatility
CNXT vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.27% | 35.21% | -2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.52% | 35.21% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.77% | 35.21% | -3.44% |
CNXT vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNXT vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than DRGN's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.08% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNXT and DRGN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CNXT.
DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.
CNXT is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 0.39% for DRGN.
Find the right allocation for CNXT and DRGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer