DRGN vs. EWT
DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRGN is a China Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index, while EWT is a Taiwan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRGN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
DRGN vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGN achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 67.15% return.
DRGN
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- YTD
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWT
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 61.09%
- YTD
- 67.15%
- 1Y
- 90.51%
- 3Y*
- 40.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 19.59%
DRGN vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 18.02% | 26.96% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 67.15% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGN and EWT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRGN vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
DRGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EWT
DRGN vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRGN | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.52 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRGN vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGN drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGN | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -64.37% | +43.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.88% | -4.79% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -19.11% | +10.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility
DRGN vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRGN | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.67% | 28.57% | +7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.67% | 23.40% | +12.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.67% | 21.90% | +13.77% |
DRGN vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRGN vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than EWT's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.03% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.65% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 12.01% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRGN and EWT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.
EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.03% for DRGN.
DRGN is categorized as China Equities, while EWT is Taiwan Equities. DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DRGN and 0.59% for EWT.
Find the right allocation for DRGN and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer