PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRGN vs. CAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRGN vs. CAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRGN

1D
0.92%
1M
2.68%
YTD
17.63%
6M
19.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAS

1D
-1.70%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRGN vs. CAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRGN and CAS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRGN vs. CAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRGN vs. CAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRGN vs. CAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRGN drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, which is greater than CAS's maximum drawdown of -5.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN and CAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRGNCASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-5.11%

-15.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

-5.11%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-3.16%

-4.89%

Volatility

DRGN vs. CAS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRGNCASDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.00%

13.51%

+21.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.00%

13.51%

+21.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.00%

13.51%

+21.49%

DRGN vs. CAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRGN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CAS's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRGN vs. CAS - Dividend Comparison

DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


DRGN and CAS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.

DRGN is categorized as Technology Equities, while CAS is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DRGN and 0.88% for CAS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRGN and CAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer