CNXT vs. BIZD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNXT returned 7.66%/yr vs 7.73%/yr for BIZD. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.

Performance

CNXT vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 41.99% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -10.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CNXT having a 7.66% annualized return and BIZD not far ahead at 7.73%.

CNXT

• 1D: 3.88%
• 1M: 8.35%
• YTD: 41.99%
• 6M: 39.66%
• 1Y: 119.78%
• 3Y*: 30.77%
• 5Y*: 5.14%
• 10Y*: 7.66%

BIZD

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -2.55%
• YTD: -10.23%
• 6M: -8.96%
• 1Y: -13.81%
• 3Y*: 4.81%
• 5Y*: 3.97%
• 10Y*: 7.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNXT vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	41.99%	59.31%	12.42%	-21.47%	-35.58%	8.78%	63.30%	42.66%	-39.48%	20.19%
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	-10.23%	-4.96%	15.63%	27.02%	-8.51%	36.25%	-7.12%	30.87%	-6.88%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and BIZD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014	0.18

CNXT vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNXT	BIZD
Industrials	42.4%	-
Technology	39.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.7%	-
Healthcare	3.8%	-
Financial Services	3.4%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CNXT vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 95
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BIZD

BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 4
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNXT vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNXT	BIZD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.73	-0.75	+4.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.32	-0.98	+5.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	0.89	+0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.87	-0.62	+10.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.07	-1.03	+30.10

CNXT vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 3.73, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and BIZD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNXT	BIZD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.98%	-55.44%	-13.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-22.22%	+10.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.60%	-22.56%	-26.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.21%	-22.91%	-38.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.30%	-55.44%	-7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-20.38%	+20.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.74%	-6.77%	-35.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	13.42%	-9.28%

Volatility

CNXT vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 12.73% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 5.30%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNXT	BIZD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.73%	5.30%	+7.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.50%	15.18%	+7.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.39%	18.47%	+13.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.55%	17.44%	+18.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.78%	21.77%	+10.01%

CNXT vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNXT vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BIZD's 14.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	14.07%	11.78%	10.94%	10.96%	11.21%	8.14%	10.39%	9.13%	10.88%	9.13%	8.51%	9.12%
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.13%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNXT and BIZD in my portfolio?

CNXT and BIZD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNXT or BIZD?

CNXT has higher volatility (12.73%) compared to BIZD (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

Which ETF is better, CNXT or BIZD?

On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.73% vs 7.66% for CNXT. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNXT or BIZD?

Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.73% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNXT or BIZD?

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNXT or BIZD?

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 14.07%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.

What is the main difference between CNXT and BIZD?

CNXT is categorized as China Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 12.86% for BIZD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.