BIZD vs. PFLT

In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly higher than PFLT's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has outperformed PFLT with an annualized return of 9.10%, while PFLT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BIZD Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the PFLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIZD and PFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, less than PFLT's 11.91% yield.

The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.47%, smaller than the maximum PFLT drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and PFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 4.83%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.