BIZD vs. PEX
BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - BIZD tracks the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index while PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIZD returned 7.49%/yr vs 4.70%/yr for PEX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIZD charges 12.86%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for PEX.
Performance
BIZD vs. PEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly higher than PEX's -13.10% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has outperformed PEX with an annualized return of 7.49%, while PEX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.70% annualized return.
BIZD
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- 1Y
- -14.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
PEX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -13.10%
- 6M
- -12.03%
- 1Y
- -14.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.97%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
BIZD vs. PEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -10.45% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.10% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIZD and PEX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.67 |
The correlation between BIZD and PEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BIZD vs. PEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BIZD
PEX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BIZD
PEX
Basic Materials
BIZD
-
PEX
Communication Services
BIZD
-
PEX
-
Consumer Cyclical
BIZD
-
PEX
-
Consumer Defensive
BIZD
-
PEX
-
Energy
BIZD
-
PEX
-
Healthcare
BIZD
-
PEX
Industrials
BIZD
-
PEX
Real Estate
BIZD
-
PEX
-
Technology
BIZD
-
PEX
-
Utilities
BIZD
-
PEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIZD vs. PEX — Risk / Return Rank
BIZD
PEX
BIZD vs. PEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIZD | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.87 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.57 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | -1.09 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIZD vs. PEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, which is greater than PEX's maximum drawdown of -49.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and PEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIZD | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.44% | -49.17% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.22% | -24.72% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -24.72% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | -36.58% | +13.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.44% | -49.17% | -6.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.57% | -21.46% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -8.25% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.24% | 12.99% | +0.25% |
Volatility
BIZD vs. PEX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) at 5.24%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIZD | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 5.24% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | 13.46% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 15.95% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 17.99% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 19.44% | +2.34% |
BIZD vs. PEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIZD has a 12.86% expense ratio, which is higher than PEX's 3.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIZD vs. PEX - Dividend Comparison
BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.10%, more than PEX's 12.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 14.10% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 12.91% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIZD and PEX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to PEX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs PEX's -49.17%.
On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.49% vs 4.70% for PEX. On fees, PEX is cheaper at 3.13% per year. On volatility, PEX has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.49% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEX is cheaper with a 3.13% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 14.10%, compared with 12.91% for PEX.
BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 12.86% for BIZD and 3.13% for PEX.
BIZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIZD and PEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer