BIZD vs. PEX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX).
BIZD and PEX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BIZD is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. It was launched on Feb 11, 2013. PEX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2013. Both BIZD and PEX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BIZD or PEX.
Key characteristics
| BIZD | PEX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.04% | 10.22% |
| 1Y Return | 23.69% | 30.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.91% | -0.08% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.34% | 5.84% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.53% | 6.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.27 | 2.53 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.03 | 3.38 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.85 | 1.31 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.85 | 16.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.30% | 1.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.01% | 12.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.47% | -49.17% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.38% | -2.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIZD and PEX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BIZD vs. PEX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly higher than PEX's 10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has outperformed PEX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while PEX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIZD vs. PEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIZD has a 10.92% expense ratio, which is higher than PEX's 3.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BIZD vs. PEX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BIZD vs. PEX - Dividend Comparison
BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, less than PEX's 13.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF | 11.25% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% | 8.51% | 5.45% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 13.86% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 4.32% | 12.50% | 6.29% | 9.06% |
Drawdowns
BIZD vs. PEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.47%, which is greater than PEX's maximum drawdown of -49.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and PEX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BIZD vs. PEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD) is 2.54%, while ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that BIZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.