CNXT vs. BIL
CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNXT returned 7.44%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
CNXT vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 36.42% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 7.44%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.
CNXT
- 1D
- -4.05%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 36.42%
- 6M
- 34.79%
- 1Y
- 122.39%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
CNXT vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 36.42% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.67% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and BIL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014 | -0.01 |
The correlation between CNXT and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
BIL
CNXT vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNXT | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -168.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 87.16 | -85.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.08 | 352.24 | -342.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.76 | 2,793.11 | -2,763.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -0.78% | -68.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -0.01% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.60% | -0.01% | -48.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | -0.09% | -61.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | -0.21% | -63.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | 0.00% | -4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -0.26% | -42.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 0.00% | +4.13% |
Volatility
CNXT vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 0.07% | +12.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.32% | 0.14% | +22.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.27% | 0.20% | +32.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.52% | 0.26% | +35.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.77% | 0.26% | +31.51% |
CNXT vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNXT vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNXT and BIL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNXT has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 7.44% vs 2.20% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 7.44% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CNXT.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.
CNXT is categorized as China Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs 3.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNXT and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer