CNXT vs. ASHX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX).

CNXT and ASHX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014. ASHX is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2015. Both CNXT and ASHX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CNXT vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CNXT vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	3.20%	59.31%	12.42%	-21.47%	-35.58%	8.78%	63.30%	42.66%	-39.48%	20.19%
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%	-13.59%	-26.45%	2.64%	42.24%	35.03%	-27.51%	20.14%

Returns By Period

CNXT

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 65.33%
• 3Y*: 12.24%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: 3.87%

ASHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNXT vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.

CNXT

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF

ASHX

Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF

Return for Risk

CNXT vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 90
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNXT vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNXT	ASHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNXT	ASHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and ASHX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CNXT vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.17%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.38%	1.76%	0.84%	0.80%	1.78%	1.07%	2.48%	19.46%	2.91%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CNXT	ASHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.37%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.41%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNXT	ASHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.89%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.92%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.54%	—	—