ASHX vs. ASHR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) are both China Equities funds - ASHX tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index while ASHR tracks the CSI 300 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASHX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.

Performance

ASHX vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASHR

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 12.76%
• 1Y: 37.06%
• 3Y*: 12.15%
• 5Y*: -1.34%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHX vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%	-13.59%	-26.45%	2.64%	42.24%	35.03%	-27.51%	20.14%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	9.53%	27.02%	11.95%	-12.52%	-27.52%	-1.57%	36.29%	36.50%	-28.45%	33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHX and ASHR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015	0.74

The correlation between ASHX and ASHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASHX vs. ASHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ASHX	ASHR
Financial Services	19.6%	20.4%
Industrials	16.0%	16.7%
Consumer Defensive	14.3%	7.3%
Technology	14.1%	26.3%
Basic Materials	9.6%	10.7%
Healthcare	7.9%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	6.7%
Utilities	4.3%	3.0%
Energy	4.2%	2.7%
Communication Services	1.5%	0.8%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.5%

Return for Risk

ASHX vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 74
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHX vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASHX	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.22	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ASHX	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-51.30%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-16.08%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-29.18%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASHX	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.84%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	23.89%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.05%	—

ASHX vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASHX vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	2.11%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.38%	1.76%	0.84%	0.80%	1.78%	1.07%	2.48%	19.46%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASHX and ASHR in my portfolio?

ASHX and ASHR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASHX or ASHR?

On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASHX or ASHR?

ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASHX or ASHR?

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.

What is the main difference between ASHX and ASHR?

ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 0.65% for ASHR.