ASHX vs. ASHR
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR).
ASHX and ASHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHX is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2015. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. Both ASHX and ASHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHX or ASHR.
Correlation
The correlation between ASHX and ASHR is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ASHX vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
ASHX
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ASHR
12.13%
-2.30%
10.28%
15.21%
-0.54%
0.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHX vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHX vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASHX vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASHX nor ASHR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 100.38% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 80.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 0.00% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
ASHX vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
ASHX vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) is 0.00%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that ASHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.