ASHX vs. NBCE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE).
ASHX and NBCE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHX is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2015. NBCE is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Oct 13, 2023.
Performance
ASHX vs. NBCE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASHX vs. NBCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -2.31% |
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF | 3.33% | 39.08% | 3.35% | -2.22% |
Returns By Period
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBCE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 32.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHX vs. NBCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NBCE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASHX vs. NBCE — Risk / Return Rank
ASHX
NBCE
ASHX vs. NBCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHX | NBCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.68 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHX and NBCE is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ASHX vs. NBCE - Dividend Comparison
ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
NBCE Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ASHX vs. NBCE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHX | NBCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -28.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -7.12% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.67% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility
ASHX vs. NBCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASHX | NBCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 20.37% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 24.20% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 24.20% | — |