PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CN vs. KBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CN vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KBA

1D
0.14%
1M
4.32%
YTD
12.62%
6M
16.80%
1Y
49.12%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CN vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%43.69%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
12.62%33.88%15.73%-16.77%-3.49%3.17%41.62%35.44%-26.28%30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CN and KBA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014

0.75

The correlation between CN and KBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CN vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CN
KBA

Financial Services

55.1%
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
5.7%

Industrials

1.0%
15.8%

Energy

0.9%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.6%

Healthcare

0.8%
4.1%

Basic Materials

0.6%
10.9%

Communication Services

0.4%
1.6%

Technology

0.3%
29.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
6.8%

Utilities

0.2%
3.2%

Financial Services

CN
55.1%
KBA
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CN
5.4%
KBA
5.7%

Industrials

CN
1.0%
KBA
15.8%

Energy

CN
0.9%
KBA
3.2%

Real Estate

CN
0.8%
KBA
0.6%

Healthcare

CN
0.8%
KBA
4.1%

Basic Materials

CN
0.6%
KBA
10.9%

Communication Services

CN
0.4%
KBA
1.6%

Technology

CN
0.3%
KBA
29.8%

Consumer Defensive

CN
0.3%
KBA
6.8%

Utilities

CN
0.2%
KBA
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CN vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CN

KBA
KBA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CN vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CN vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNKBADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

Drawdowns

CN vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNKBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

Volatility

CN vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNKBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.32%

CN vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CN vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.39%1.56%2.18%2.34%49.05%9.07%0.65%1.53%3.77%1.46%6.62%29.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


CN and KBA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KBA.

KBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

CN tracks MSCI China All Shares, while KBA tracks MSCI China A Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.60% for KBA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CN and KBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer