CN vs. KBA
CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both China Equities funds - CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares while KBA tracks the MSCI China A Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.
Performance
CN vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBA
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 6M
- 16.80%
- 1Y
- 49.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
CN vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.10% | -11.87% | -23.85% | -12.74% | 31.55% | 26.79% | -22.41% | 43.69% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 12.62% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 41.62% | 35.44% | -26.28% | 30.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CN and KBA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014 | 0.75 |
The correlation between CN and KBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CN vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CN
KBA
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
CN
KBA
Consumer Cyclical
CN
KBA
Industrials
CN
KBA
Energy
CN
KBA
Real Estate
CN
KBA
Healthcare
CN
KBA
Basic Materials
CN
KBA
Communication Services
CN
KBA
Technology
CN
KBA
Consumer Defensive
CN
KBA
Utilities
CN
KBA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CN vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank
CN
KBA
CN vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CN | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.35 | — |
Drawdowns
CN vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CN | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -53.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.25% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -25.81% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility
CN vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CN | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 17.65% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 27.20% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 25.32% | — |
CN vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CN vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.39% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CN and KBA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KBA.
KBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for CN.
CN tracks MSCI China All Shares, while KBA tracks MSCI China A Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.60% for KBA.
Find the right allocation for CN and KBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer