PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMS vs. DTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMS vs. DTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and DTE Energy Company (DTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMS achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than DTE's 10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CMS has underperformed DTE with an annualized return of 8.30%, while DTE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.58% annualized return.


CMS

1D
-2.27%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
1.95%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
8.30%

DTE

1D
-0.59%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
10.81%
6M
8.29%
1Y
8.11%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMS vs. DTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
1.95%8.13%18.60%-5.21%0.84%9.71%-0.32%30.04%8.25%17.03%
DTE
DTE Energy Company
10.81%10.42%13.49%-2.81%1.23%19.35%-2.86%21.38%4.21%14.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CMS and DTE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1985

0.53

Over the past year, CMS and DTE have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

CMS:

$4.92

DTE:

$4.92

PE Ratio

CMS:

14.27

DTE:

28.84

PS Ratio

CMS:

1.79

DTE:

1.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMS:

$8.82B

DTE:

$16.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMS:

$4.16B

DTE:

$9.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMS:

$3.09B

DTE:

$4.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMS vs. DTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMS
CMS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DTE
DTE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMS vs. DTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and DTE Energy Company (DTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMSDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.10

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

0.80

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

1.87

-1.38

CMS vs. DTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the DTE Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMS and DTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMSDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

0.51

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.40

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.43

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.35

-0.01

Drawdowns

CMS vs. DTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMS drawdown since its inception was -91.20%, which is greater than DTE's maximum drawdown of -67.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMS and DTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMSDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.20%

-67.92%

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-10.13%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.61%

-17.97%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.56%

-28.93%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.55%

-42.45%

+12.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.48%

-6.51%

-4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-17.23%

-10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

4.34%

-0.18%

Volatility

CMS vs. DTE - Volatility Comparison

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) and DTE Energy Company (DTE) have volatilities of 5.86% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMSDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

5.91%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

12.48%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.93%

16.11%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.96%

18.80%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

22.30%

-1.62%

Dividends

CMS vs. DTE - Dividend Comparison

CMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, which matches DTE's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
3.17%3.10%3.09%3.36%3.62%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%
DTE
DTE Energy Company
3.18%3.44%3.44%3.52%3.07%2.98%3.40%2.96%3.26%3.07%3.10%3.54%

Financials

CMS vs. DTE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMS Energy Corporation and DTE Energy Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
2.73B
5.14B
(CMS) Total Revenue
(DTE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMS vs. DTE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CMS Energy Corporation and DTE Energy Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
85.7%
Portfolio components
CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DTE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DTE Energy Company reported a gross profit of 4.41B and revenue of 5.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.7%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 490.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.

DTE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DTE Energy Company reported an operating income of 412.00M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 340.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

DTE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DTE Energy Company reported a net income of 1.19M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMS and DTE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTE has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to CMS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMS dropped -91.20% vs DTE's -67.92%.

DTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMS and DTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer