PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLS vs. BLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and BLD is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

CLS vs. BLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and TopBuild Corp. (BLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
71.76%
-17.74%
CLS
BLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLS:

4.09

BLD:

-0.43

Sortino Ratio

CLS:

3.92

BLD:

-0.39

Omega Ratio

CLS:

1.51

BLD:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

CLS:

3.39

BLD:

-0.48

Martin Ratio

CLS:

20.09

BLD:

-1.13

Ulcer Index

CLS:

11.35%

BLD:

15.07%

Daily Std Dev

CLS:

55.72%

BLD:

39.49%

Max Drawdown

CLS:

-96.93%

BLD:

-52.26%

Current Drawdown

CLS:

-0.96%

BLD:

-34.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLS:

$11.40B

BLD:

$10.03B

EPS

CLS:

$3.16

BLD:

$19.79

PE Ratio

CLS:

30.95

BLD:

17.18

PEG Ratio

CLS:

19.42

BLD:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLS:

$9.29B

BLD:

$5.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLS:

$941.37M

BLD:

$1.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLS:

$719.13M

BLD:

$1.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 235.55% return, which is significantly higher than BLD's -16.15% return.


CLS

YTD

235.55%

1M

13.36%

6M

71.77%

1Y

233.16%

5Y*

64.88%

10Y*

23.63%

BLD

YTD

-16.15%

1M

-19.11%

6M

-17.73%

1Y

-17.23%

5Y*

25.06%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLS vs. BLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and TopBuild Corp. (BLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLS, currently valued at 4.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.09-0.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLS, currently valued at 3.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.92-0.39
The chart of Omega ratio for CLS, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.510.95
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLS, currently valued at 6.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.49-0.48
The chart of Martin ratio for CLS, currently valued at 20.09, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0020.09-1.13
CLS
BLD

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 4.09, which is higher than the BLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and BLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.09
-0.43
CLS
BLD

Dividends

CLS vs. BLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLS nor BLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CLS vs. BLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than BLD's maximum drawdown of -52.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and BLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.96%
-34.50%
CLS
BLD

Volatility

CLS vs. BLD - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to TopBuild Corp. (BLD) at 9.52%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
15.19%
9.52%
CLS
BLD

Financials

CLS vs. BLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and TopBuild Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab