PortfoliosLab logo
CLS vs. BLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and BLD is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CLS vs. BLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and TopBuild Corp. (BLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLS:

1.35

BLD:

-0.75

Sortino Ratio

CLS:

1.80

BLD:

-0.86

Omega Ratio

CLS:

1.26

BLD:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

CLS:

1.75

BLD:

-0.70

Martin Ratio

CLS:

4.29

BLD:

-1.10

Ulcer Index

CLS:

21.95%

BLD:

27.14%

Daily Std Dev

CLS:

75.47%

BLD:

42.65%

Max Drawdown

CLS:

-96.93%

BLD:

-52.26%

Current Drawdown

CLS:

-19.69%

BLD:

-40.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLS:

$13.41B

BLD:

$8.08B

EPS

CLS:

$3.58

BLD:

$19.72

PE Ratio

CLS:

32.51

BLD:

14.33

PEG Ratio

CLS:

19.42

BLD:

0.00

PS Ratio

CLS:

1.33

BLD:

1.53

PB Ratio

CLS:

8.72

BLD:

3.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLS:

$10.09B

BLD:

$5.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLS:

$1.07B

BLD:

$1.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLS:

$724.86M

BLD:

$1.01B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 25.01% return, which is significantly higher than BLD's -9.14% return.


CLS

YTD

25.01%

1M

35.18%

6M

35.36%

1Y

101.01%

3Y*

118.70%

5Y*

76.27%

10Y*

24.69%

BLD

YTD

-9.14%

1M

-4.35%

6M

-27.58%

1Y

-31.56%

3Y*

12.77%

5Y*

19.79%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Celestica Inc.

TopBuild Corp.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLS vs. BLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLS is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLS is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLS is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLD is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLD is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLD is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLD is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLD is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLD is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLS vs. BLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and TopBuild Corp. (BLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the BLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and BLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CLS vs. BLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLS nor BLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CLS vs. BLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than BLD's maximum drawdown of -52.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and BLD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CLS vs. BLD - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 14.80% compared to TopBuild Corp. (BLD) at 11.51%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CLS vs. BLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and TopBuild Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.65B
1.23B
(CLS) Total Revenue
(BLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLS vs. BLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celestica Inc. and TopBuild Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
10.3%
28.5%
(CLS) Gross Margin
(BLD) Gross Margin
CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 273.90M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

BLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TopBuild Corp. reported a gross profit of 351.47M and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 128.80M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

BLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TopBuild Corp. reported an operating income of 177.49M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 86.20M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

BLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TopBuild Corp. reported a net income of 123.39M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.