CLOU vs. IGV
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) are both Technology Equities funds - CLOU tracks the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index while IGV tracks the S&P North American Technology-Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned 0.30%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for IGV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IGV.
Performance
CLOU vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -0.91% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
IGV
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 20.89%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 0.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
CLOU vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 13.35% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 77.18% | 4.79% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -0.91% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and IGV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between CLOU and IGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
CLOU vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOU
IGV
Technology
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CLOU
IGV
Real Estate
CLOU
IGV
-
Communication Services
CLOU
IGV
Consumer Cyclical
CLOU
IGV
Healthcare
CLOU
IGV
-
Basic Materials
CLOU
-
IGV
-
Consumer Defensive
CLOU
-
IGV
-
Energy
CLOU
-
IGV
-
Financial Services
CLOU
-
IGV
Industrials
CLOU
-
IGV
Utilities
CLOU
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
IGV
CLOU vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLOU | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.03 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 0.23 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.03 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 0.03 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 0.06 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOU | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.03 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.30 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.37 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -63.45% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -36.61% | +9.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -36.61% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -45.85% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.82% | -11.09% | -7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -14.44% | -9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 17.20% | -6.19% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) at 10.44%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 10.44% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.52% | 23.98% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 27.27% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.53% | 27.79% | +2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 26.31% | +4.46% |
CLOU vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOU vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLOU nor IGV has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and IGV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLOU has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to IGV (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 5-year performance, IGV leads with 8.21% vs 0.30% for CLOU. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 10.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGV has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.
CLOU and IGV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.46% for IGV.
CLOU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer