CLOU vs. SKYU
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU).
CLOU and SKYU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLOU is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019. SKYU is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 19, 2021. Both CLOU and SKYU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLOU or SKYU.
Key characteristics
| CLOU | SKYU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -10.11% | 4.92% |
| 1Y Return | 23.23% | 90.71% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.13% | -19.66% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.03 | 2.14 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.83% | 44.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -52.92% | -83.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -34.35% | -60.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and SKYU is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CLOU vs. SKYU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a -10.11% return, which is significantly lower than SKYU's 4.92% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLOU vs. SKYU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SKYU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLOU vs. SKYU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLOU vs. SKYU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLOU nor SKYU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. SKYU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -52.92%, smaller than the maximum SKYU drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and SKYU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLOU vs. SKYU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is 5.06%, while ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that CLOU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SKYU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.