CLOU vs. SKYU
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and SKYU (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while SKYU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned 0.30%/yr vs 4.20%/yr for SKYU. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SKYU.
Performance
CLOU vs. SKYU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than SKYU's 29.06% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
SKYU
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 48.96%
- YTD
- 29.06%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 54.01%
- 3Y*
- 41.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOU vs. SKYU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 13.35% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -5.24% |
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 29.06% | 2.76% | 65.79% | 105.76% | -75.95% | 7.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and SKYU is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between CLOU and SKYU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
CLOU vs. SKYU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOU
SKYU
Technology
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CLOU
SKYU
Real Estate
CLOU
SKYU
-
Communication Services
CLOU
SKYU
Consumer Cyclical
CLOU
SKYU
Healthcare
CLOU
SKYU
Basic Materials
CLOU
-
SKYU
-
Consumer Defensive
CLOU
-
SKYU
-
Energy
CLOU
-
SKYU
-
Financial Services
CLOU
-
SKYU
-
Industrials
CLOU
-
SKYU
Utilities
CLOU
-
SKYU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. SKYU — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
SKYU
CLOU vs. SKYU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLOU | SKYU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.98 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 1.61 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 1.11 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 2.34 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOU | SKYU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.98 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.07 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.05 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. SKYU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum SKYU drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and SKYU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | SKYU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -83.01% | +29.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -50.23% | +22.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -55.71% | +22.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -83.01% | +29.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.82% | -16.89% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -49.20% | +24.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 23.87% | -12.86% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. SKYU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is 13.10%, while ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a volatility of 21.37%. This indicates that CLOU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SKYU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | SKYU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 21.37% | -8.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.52% | 46.22% | -21.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 55.51% | -26.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.53% | 61.82% | -31.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 61.09% | -30.32% |
CLOU vs. SKYU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SKYU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOU vs. SKYU - Dividend Comparison
CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
SKYU ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and SKYU have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYU has higher volatility (21.37%) compared to CLOU (13.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs SKYU's -83.01%.
On 5-year performance, SKYU leads with 4.20% vs 0.30% for CLOU. On fees, CLOU is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, CLOU has been the lower-risk option at 13.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SKYU has performed better with a 4.20% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLOU is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKYU.
SKYU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.
CLOU is categorized as Technology Equities, while SKYU is Leveraged Equities. CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while SKYU tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.95% for SKYU.
SKYU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and SKYU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer