PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOU vs. FCLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOU vs. FCLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than FCLD's 33.66% return.


CLOU

1D
1.25%
1M
8.35%
6M
22.02%
YTD
11.23%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
6.02%
5Y*
-2.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.48%

FCLD

1D
1.33%
1M
4.17%
6M
35.89%
YTD
33.66%
1Y
45.67%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.92M$6.97M$6.65M
$599.13K$567.95K$795.73K

CLOU vs. FCLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
11.23%-5.59%5.74%41.36%-39.56%-7.74%
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
33.66%8.19%21.80%53.05%-41.32%-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and FCLD is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021

0.90

The correlation between CLOU and FCLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOU vs. FCLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLOU
CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FCLD
FCLD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLOU vs. FCLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLOUFCLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

2.28

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

5.48

-4.55

CLOU vs. FCLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the FCLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and FCLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. FCLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than FCLD's maximum drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and FCLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOUFCLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-50.85%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.24%

-17.48%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.18%

-34.80%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.34%

-4.65%

-15.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.45%

-20.08%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.85%

7.31%

+4.54%

Volatility

CLOU vs. FCLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) at 6.98%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOUFCLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

6.98%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.80%

22.27%

+3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.96%

28.80%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.87%

30.39%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.74%

30.39%

+0.35%

CLOU vs. FCLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FCLD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOU vs. FCLD - Dividend Comparison

CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.76%0.00%0.05%
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
0.01%0.03%0.13%0.17%0.26%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOU and FCLD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOU has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to FCLD (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs FCLD's -50.85%.

On 3-year performance, FCLD leads with 24.29% vs 6.02% for CLOU. On fees, FCLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FCLD has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FCLD has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.

FCLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.

CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.39% for FCLD.

FCLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOU and FCLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer