CLOU vs. WCLD
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and WCLD (WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund) are both Technology Equities funds - CLOU tracks the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index while WCLD tracks the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned -2.17%/yr vs -9.16%/yr for WCLD. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WCLD.
Performance
CLOU vs. WCLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than WCLD's 1.37% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 22.02%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 14.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- -2.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.48%
WCLD
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.24%
- 5Y*
- -9.16%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.92M | $6.97M | $6.65M | |
| $33.74M | $31.40M | $33.73M |
CLOU vs. WCLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 11.23% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 77.18% | -1.04% |
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund | 1.37% | -6.69% | 7.35% | 39.35% | -51.64% | -3.21% | 109.71% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and WCLD is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between CLOU and WCLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
CLOU vs. WCLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOU
WCLD
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CLOU
WCLD
Communication Services
CLOU
WCLD
Real Estate
CLOU
WCLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLOU
WCLD
-
Healthcare
CLOU
WCLD
Basic Materials
CLOU
-
WCLD
-
Consumer Defensive
CLOU
-
WCLD
-
Energy
CLOU
-
WCLD
-
Financial Services
CLOU
-
WCLD
-
Industrials
CLOU
-
WCLD
-
Utilities
CLOU
-
WCLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. WCLD — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
WCLD
CLOU vs. WCLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOU | WCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.04 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.04 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 0.09 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. WCLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum WCLD drawdown of -64.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and WCLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | WCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -64.90% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -34.68% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -42.06% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -64.90% | +11.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.34% | -45.68% | +25.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -35.87% | +11.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.85% | 15.43% | -3.58% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. WCLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is 7.61%, while WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) has a volatility of 10.36%. This indicates that CLOU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | WCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 10.36% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.80% | 31.49% | -5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.96% | 36.94% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.87% | 37.79% | -6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.74% | 37.43% | -6.69% |
CLOU vs. WCLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than WCLD's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOU vs. WCLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLOU nor WCLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CLOU and WCLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
WCLD has higher volatility (10.36%) compared to CLOU (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs WCLD's -64.90%.
On 5-year performance, CLOU leads with -2.17% vs -9.16% for WCLD. On fees, WCLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CLOU has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CLOU has performed better with a -2.17% return vs -9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WCLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.
CLOU and WCLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while WCLD tracks BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.45% for WCLD.
CLOU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and WCLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer