PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOU vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOU vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 8.64% return.


CLOU

1D
-3.71%
1M
14.89%
YTD
9.15%
6M
6.98%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*

GINN

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.38%
YTD
8.64%
6M
7.90%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
9.15%-5.59%5.74%41.36%-39.56%-3.27%14.91%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
8.64%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and GINN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.82

The correlation between CLOU and GINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLOU vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CLOU
GINN

Technology

85.3%
32.4%

Real Estate

5.6%
0.8%

Communication Services

5.5%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
14.6%

Healthcare

0.6%
18.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

11.4%

Industrials

-

6.1%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Technology

CLOU
85.3%
GINN
32.4%

Real Estate

CLOU
5.6%
GINN
0.8%

Communication Services

CLOU
5.5%
GINN
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CLOU
3.0%
GINN
14.6%

Healthcare

CLOU
0.6%
GINN
18.6%

Basic Materials

CLOU

-

GINN
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

CLOU

-

GINN
2.0%

Energy

CLOU

-

GINN
1.4%

Financial Services

CLOU

-

GINN
11.4%

Industrials

CLOU

-

GINN
6.1%

Utilities

CLOU

-

GINN
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOU vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU
CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOUGINNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

1.61

-1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.51

2.25

-1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.28

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.95

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.58

7.06

-6.48

CLOU vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOUGINNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

1.61

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.32

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.45

-0.21

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOUGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-41.25%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.24%

-13.18%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.18%

-22.25%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.74%

-41.25%

-12.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.83%

-1.63%

-20.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-13.37%

-11.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.02%

3.64%

+7.38%

Volatility

CLOU vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.85% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 3.98%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOUGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.85%

3.98%

+9.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.82%

12.04%

+12.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.50%

16.06%

+13.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.57%

21.33%

+9.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.79%

21.05%

+9.74%

CLOU vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOU vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.76%0.00%0.05%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOU and GINN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOU has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to GINN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs GINN's -41.25%.

On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 6.82% vs -0.66% for CLOU. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 6.82% return vs -0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.

CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.50% for GINN.

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOU and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer