CLOU vs. GINN
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CLOU tracks the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned -0.66%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for GINN. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.
Performance
CLOU vs. GINN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 8.64% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 14.89%
- YTD
- 9.15%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.18%
- 5Y*
- -0.66%
- 10Y*
- —
GINN
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 8.64%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOU vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 9.15% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 14.91% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 8.64% | 20.25% | 18.71% | 29.94% | -32.40% | 10.39% | 9.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and GINN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CLOU and GINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CLOU vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOU
GINN
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CLOU
GINN
Real Estate
CLOU
GINN
Communication Services
CLOU
GINN
Consumer Cyclical
CLOU
GINN
Healthcare
CLOU
GINN
Basic Materials
CLOU
-
GINN
Consumer Defensive
CLOU
-
GINN
Energy
CLOU
-
GINN
Financial Services
CLOU
-
GINN
Industrials
CLOU
-
GINN
Utilities
CLOU
-
GINN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
GINN
CLOU vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLOU | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | 1.61 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.51 | 2.25 | -1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.28 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 1.95 | -1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 7.06 | -6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOU | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.61 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.32 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.45 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and GINN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -41.25% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -13.18% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -22.25% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -41.25% | -12.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.83% | -1.63% | -20.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -13.37% | -11.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.02% | 3.64% | +7.38% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.85% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 3.98%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.85% | 3.98% | +9.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.82% | 12.04% | +12.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.50% | 16.06% | +13.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.57% | 21.33% | +9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.79% | 21.05% | +9.74% |
CLOU vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOU vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison
CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and GINN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLOU has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to GINN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs GINN's -41.25%.
On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 6.82% vs -0.66% for CLOU. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 6.82% return vs -0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.
GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.
CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.50% for GINN.
GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and GINN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer