CLOU vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

CLOU and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLOU is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

CLOU vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLOU vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	-13.79%	7.31%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	39.97%	-2.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a -13.79% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 39.97% return.

CLOU

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: -13.79%
• 6M: -16.17%
• 1Y: -7.10%
• 3Y*: 2.05%
• 5Y*: -5.59%
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: 20.77%
• YTD: 39.97%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

CLOU

Global X Cloud Computing ETF

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

CLOU vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU

CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 7
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOU	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOU	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.80	-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and ARMH is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLOU vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.76%	0.00%	0.05%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.42%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOU	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.74%	-42.04%	-11.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.26%	-13.75%	-24.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.21%	-16.33%	-7.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLOU	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.28%	50.59%	-21.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.63%	50.59%	-20.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.31%	50.59%	-20.28%