PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLH vs. QCLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLH and QCLN is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CLH vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.65%
1.26%
CLH
QCLN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLH:

1.42

QCLN:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

CLH:

1.98

QCLN:

0.02

Omega Ratio

CLH:

1.28

QCLN:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

CLH:

2.89

QCLN:

-0.08

Martin Ratio

CLH:

9.24

QCLN:

-0.43

Ulcer Index

CLH:

4.18%

QCLN:

11.69%

Daily Std Dev

CLH:

27.10%

QCLN:

33.46%

Max Drawdown

CLH:

-95.54%

QCLN:

-76.18%

Current Drawdown

CLH:

-13.33%

QCLN:

-57.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLH achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CLH has outperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 17.65%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.79% annualized return.


CLH

YTD

-0.81%

1M

-7.96%

6M

3.65%

1Y

36.50%

5Y*

22.14%

10Y*

17.65%

QCLN

YTD

7.40%

1M

2.82%

6M

1.25%

1Y

-6.23%

5Y*

7.74%

10Y*

8.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLH vs. QCLN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLH is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLH is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLH is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLH is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLH is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLH is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QCLN is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QCLN is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QCLN is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QCLN is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QCLN is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QCLN is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLH vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLH, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.42-0.15
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLH, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.980.02
The chart of Omega ratio for CLH, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.281.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLH, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.89-0.08
The chart of Martin ratio for CLH, currently valued at 9.24, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.009.24-0.43
CLH
QCLN

The current CLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLH and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.42
-0.15
CLH
QCLN

Dividends

CLH vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.81%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.25%0.72%0.78%

Drawdowns

CLH vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLH drawdown since its inception was -95.54%, which is greater than QCLN's maximum drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLH and QCLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-13.33%
-57.91%
CLH
QCLN

Volatility

CLH vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) is 7.22%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that CLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.22%
10.09%
CLH
QCLN
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab